Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Maximizers' Susceptibility to the Effect of Frequency vs. Percentage Format in Risk Representation
Raffaella Misuraca1, Palmira Faraci2, Costanza Scaffidi Abbate3
1Department of Political Sciences and International Relations (DEMS), University of Palermo, 90134 Palermo, Italy.
Abstract:
The present study explored the susceptibility of maximizers to the effect of the specific information format-frequency vs. percentage-in a risk assessment task. One-hundred and fourteen participants were randomized into two experimental conditions: a frequency format and a percentage format. In both conditions, participants had to rate the level of risk that a mental patient would harm someone after his discharge from a mental health facility, based on the information reported in the psychologist's assessment for that patient. In the frequency condition, the information was presented in terms of frequencies, whereas in the percentage condition the same information was presented in terms of percentage. Our experiment showed that resolute maximizers are less affected by the specific format of the task than fearful maximizers. Thus, we conclude that resolute maximizers are more normative decision-makers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Percentage Frequency Distribution
The process of making a percentage frequency distribution involves the following few steps: note the total number of observations;...
Hazard Rate
Relative Risk
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Framing Effects
Relative Frequency Histogram

