Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

466
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
466
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

555
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
555
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

684
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
684
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.5K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.5K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

687
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
687
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

335
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
335

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resonant Drive Techniques for Electrostatic Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS): A Comparative Study.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

NEMS generated electromechanical frequency combs.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2025
Same author

MOF-based spectrophotometric sensors for cholesterol detection: current trends and challenges.

RSC advances·2024
Same author

Generation of Soliton Frequency Combs in NEMS.

Nano letters·2024
Same author

Thermal noise-driven resonant sensors.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2024
Same author

Unraveling the nature of sensing in electrostatic MEMS gas sensors.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.3K

Detection Methods for Multi-Modal Inertial Gas Sensors.

Fehmi Najar1,2, Mehdi Ghommem3, Samed Kocer4

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering at Al Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study explores asymmetric arch microbeams for advanced inertial gas sensors. Novel detection methods, like modal ratio and differential capacitance, significantly boost sensor sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Keywords:
arch beamasymmetric actuationbifurcation-based detectiondifferential capacitancegas sensorsmodal ratio

More Related Videos

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

561
Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.3K
Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

561
Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K

Area of Science:

  • Micro/Nanoelectromechanical Systems (MEMS/NEMS)
  • Nonlinear Dynamics
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Electrostatically actuated asymmetric arch microbeams offer potential for high-performance inertial gas sensors.
  • Exploiting multi-modal motions, including veering and modal hybridization, is key to enhancing sensor capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the design of inertial gas sensors using asymmetric arch microbeams with enhanced sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • To compare the performance of different detection mechanisms for these sensors.

Main Methods:

  • Development and validation of a nonlinear dynamic reduced-order model for the asymmetric arch microbeam sensor.
  • Implementation and comparison of four detection mechanisms: frequency shift, conventional bifurcation, modal ratio, and differential capacitance.

Main Results:

  • Frequency shift and conventional bifurcation sensors show comparable sensitivities.
  • Modal interactions (veering and hybridization) enhance sensitivity and SNR for bifurcation-based sensors.
  • Modal ratio detection increases signal by three orders of magnitude; differential capacitance sensor increases signal by two orders of magnitude compared to conventional bifurcation.

Conclusions:

  • Asymmetric arch microbeams enable the design of highly sensitive inertial gas sensors.
  • Modal ratio and differential capacitance sensing mechanisms offer significant improvements in detection signal and performance.