Identifying classification systems regarding vascular access for haemodialysis: protocol for a scoping review

Area of Science:

• Nephrology
• Vascular Surgery
• Medical Informatics

Background:

• Effective classification systems are crucial for organizing data and research in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) care.
• Vascular access management for haemodialysis involves multiple specialists, necessitating clear guidelines and evidence-based recommendations.
• Existing classification systems for haemodialysis vascular access require a comprehensive review to ensure optimal patient care and research comparability.

Purpose of the Study:

• To systematically identify and summarize existing classification systems for vascular access used in haemodialysis.
• To provide a transparent and pragmatic protocol for a scoping review in this specialized medical field.
• To avoid duplication of efforts in reviewing vascular access classification literature.

Main Methods:

• A scoping review methodology based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines will be employed.
• Literature searches will be conducted across major databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar) and ClinicalTrials.gov.
• Inclusion criteria encompass classifications related to preprocedural assessment, insertion, creation, and complications of vascular access for haemodialysis, excluding peritoneal dialysis.

Main Results:

• The review will present a comprehensive summary of identified classification systems for haemodialysis vascular access.
• Evidence regarding the application and outcomes associated with different classification systems will be synthesized.
• The findings will highlight gaps and areas for future research in vascular access classification.

Conclusions:

• This scoping review will consolidate current knowledge on vascular access classification systems for haemodialysis.
• The findings are expected to inform the development of standardized classifications and improve clinical practice guidelines.
• Establishing a clear understanding of existing classifications will support comparative research and enhance patient outcomes in ESRD management.