Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Relationship building in pediatric research recruitment: Insights from qualitative interviews with research staff
Stephanie A Kraft1,2, Kathryn M Porter2, Tara R Sullivan3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Insights
Pediatric research staff build trust by focusing on individual skills, relational interactions, and institutional support. Ensuring staff have a voice is crucial for equitable patient recruitment and advocacy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric clinical research
- Health services research
- Qualitative research methods
Background:
- Clinical research staff are vital for recruiting families in pediatric studies.
- Understanding their perspectives on building trust is essential but underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe how pediatric research staff foster trusting relationships with patients and families.
- To identify factors influencing trust-building in pediatric clinical research recruitment.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 research staff at a pediatric institution and academic medical center.
- The interview guide was based on a framework for trusting researcher-community partnerships.
- Participants were eligible if involved in recruitment, consent, or enrollment for clinical research.
Main Results:
- Staff identified individual (skills, role perception, motivation), relational (approach, connection, follow-up), and structural (access, diversity, clinical integration, pandemic impact) factors in relationship building.
- Key themes included managing tensions, integrating research with clinical care, the importance of voluntariness, and research inequities.
Conclusions:
- Research staff experiences highlight the need for institutional support and empowerment.
- Giving staff a voice in policy development is crucial for effective and equitable patient recruitment.
- Supporting staff advocacy for patients and families enhances trust in pediatric research.
Introduction:
Clinical research staff play a critical role in recruiting families for pediatric research, but their views are not well described. We aimed to describe how pediatric research staff build trusting research relationships with patients and their families.
Methods:
We interviewed research staff at one pediatric research institution and its affiliated academic medical center between November 2020 and February 2021. Staff were eligible if they conducted participant recruitment, consent, and/or enrollment for clinical research. We developed our semi-structured interview guide based on a framework for trusting researcher-community partnerships.
Results:
We interviewed 28 research staff, with a median age of 28 years (range 22-50) and a median of 5 years of experience (range 1-29). Interviewees identified factors relevant to relationship building across three levels: the individual staff member, the relational interaction with the family, and the institutional or other structural backdrop. Individual factors included how staff developed recruitment skills, their perceived roles, and their personal motivations. Relational factors spanned four stages of recruitment: before the approach, forming an initial connection with a family, building the connection, and following up. Structural factors were related to access and diversity, clinical interactions, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions:
Research staff discussed tensions and supports with various actors, challenges with the integration of research and clinical care, the importance of voluntariness for building trust, and multiple contributors to inequities in research. These findings reveal the importance of ensuring research staff have a voice in institutional policies and are supported to advocate for patients and families.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Data Collection II
Group Design
Longitudinal Research
Naturalistic Observations
Case Studies

