Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

549
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
549
Storage01:23

Storage

123
A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze...
123
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

929
Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...
929
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

411
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
411
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

174
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
174
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

350
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
350

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pre-stimulus brain states predict and control variability in stimulation responses.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Transient boosting of action potential backpropagation for few-shot temporal pattern learning.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Building on models-a perspective for computational neuroscience.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Predictive learning rules generate a cortical-like replay of probabilistic sensory experiences.

eLife·2025
Same author

Parallel processing of past and future memories through reactivation and synaptic plasticity mechanisms during sleep.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Recurrent Interneuron Connectivity Does Not Support Synchrony in a Biophysical Dentate Gyrus Model.

eNeuro·2025
Same journal

Transcriptomic and epigenetic characterization of paraventricular thalamic nucleus neurons in Polg1 mutant mice.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same journal

Modulation of the EEG alpha-band envelope during mental tasks: A task-related index based on second-order derivatives.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same journal

Enhanced calcium activity and transcriptomic alterations in iPSC-derived neurons from BAFME patients with repeat expansions.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same journal

Clustered protocadherinβs contribute to configuring functional cell populations in hippocampal-cortical regions.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same journal

ALS-associated protein TDP-43 disturbs axonal projections in the somatosensory cortex.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same journal

Microglial ontogeny and in vitro reconstruction: Bridging development and modeling.

Neuroscience research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

15.0K

Computational models of Idling brain activity for memory processing.

Tomoki Fukai1

  • 1Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Tancha 1919-1, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.

Neuroscience Research
|January 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article explores how the brain's background, or spontaneous, activity helps process memories. While often dismissed as noise, this internal activity may actually organize past experiences during rest or sleep. The author reviews current models that attempt to explain how these patterns are generated and what roles they play in memory.

Keywords:
AvalancheLognormalNeuronalPre-playReplySharp-wave ripplesSynaptic plasticityUP-DOWN statesneural networksmemory consolidationspontaneous activityartificial intelligencecognitive function

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

15.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience and idling brain activity research
  • Systems biology of cognitive function

Background:

No consensus exists regarding the precise function of spontaneous neural fluctuations during periods of rest. Prior research has shown that these internal signals persist across diverse states including sleep and quiet wakefulness. This gap motivated an investigation into whether such patterns represent mere background noise or active information processing. It was already known that previous sensory experiences leave lasting traces on subsequent network firing. That uncertainty drove the need to synthesize how these signals contribute to memory consolidation. No prior work had resolved why these patterns vary significantly between different cortical regions. This review addresses the discrepancy between observed neural activity and current artificial intelligence capabilities. The lack of spontaneous dynamics in synthetic machines highlights a major limitation in modern computing.

Purpose Of The Study:

This article aims to review the various forms of spontaneous neural activity and their roles in memory processing. The author addresses the challenge of understanding how the brain generates internally driven signals. This work seeks to clarify why these patterns are often misinterpreted as mere background noise. The motivation stems from the need to improve current artificial intelligence by incorporating biological idling states. The study investigates how previous experiences shape the subsequent patterns of neural firing. It explores the computational mechanisms that allow the brain to process information offline. The author identifies the gap between observed neural dynamics and existing synthetic machine architectures. This review provides a foundation for future modeling efforts by synthesizing diverse experimental evidence.

Main Methods:

Review approach involves a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature on spontaneous neural dynamics. The author evaluates diverse modeling strategies used to replicate internal network fluctuations. This assessment focuses on how different studies define and simulate idling states. The methodology includes comparing findings across various animal models and cortical regions. The investigation categorizes research based on the proposed computational roles of these signals. The author examines how previous sensory experiences are integrated into these theoretical frameworks. This review approach highlights the limitations of current simulations in capturing biological complexity. The study synthesizes data from multiple experimental paradigms to clarify the generation mechanisms of these patterns.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that spontaneous neural patterns are not random noise but structured representations of past experiences. The review demonstrates that these signals participate in offline processing during rest and sleep states. Evidence shows that the computational roles of these activities vary significantly between different brain regions. The literature confirms that prior sensory and behavioral events influence subsequent network firing patterns. The author reports that current artificial intelligence machines lack these unique internally driven dynamics. The synthesis reveals that generation mechanisms for these states are highly dependent on the specific function being studied. The findings suggest that existing models struggle to capture the full diversity of these neural phenomena. The review highlights that memory processing is supported by both evoked responses and persistent internal activity.

Conclusions:

The author proposes that spontaneous fluctuations serve as a substrate for offline memory organization. Synthesis and implications suggest that these signals are not random but carry structured information from prior events. The review indicates that computational models must account for regional differences in neural dynamics. Authors claim that integrating these features could improve the design of intelligent machines. The evidence supports the view that internal activity facilitates the consolidation of past experiences. Researchers suggest that future models should prioritize the generation mechanisms of these persistent states. The synthesis highlights that memory processing relies on both evoked and internally driven neural patterns. The analysis concludes that spontaneous dynamics are integral to the functional architecture of the brain.

The researchers propose that spontaneous activity functions as an internal mechanism for offline memory organization. Unlike random noise, these patterns are internally driven by neuronal networks and represent a unique state that facilitates the processing of previous sensory and behavioral experiences during rest or sleep.

The author examines various computational models designed to simulate the generation and functional roles of idling neural states. These frameworks attempt to bridge the gap between observed biological patterns and the lack of such dynamics in current artificial intelligence systems.

The author suggests that regional specificity is necessary because neural activity patterns and their computational roles differ significantly across distinct brain areas. Modeling these variations is required to understand how different functions utilize spontaneous signals for information processing.

Spontaneous activity acts as a data-driven component that reflects previous experiences. By incorporating these internal signals, models move beyond simple input-output systems to include offline processing, which is a feature currently absent in many synthetic intelligent machines.

The review measures the phenomenon of idling brain states by synthesizing literature on neural firing patterns observed during awake, sleep, and resting periods. This approach contrasts with traditional studies that focus solely on evoked responses to external stimuli.

The author claims that incorporating spontaneous dynamics is a potential pathway for advancing artificial intelligence. By mimicking the brain's ability to process information offline, developers may overcome current limitations in machine learning architectures that lack internally driven activity.