Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
Limb outcomes based on limb severity and anatomic complexity following infrapopliteal vein bypass for Japanese
Taira Kobayashi1, Masaki Hamamoto1, Takanobu Okazaki1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Insights
Limb salvage and wound healing after infrapopliteal vein bypass depend on limb severity (WIfI stage), not anatomic complexity (GLASS stage). Patients with advanced WIfI stage 4 had poorer outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored management.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Limb Revascularization
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- The 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines recommend revascularization strategies based on limb severity (WIfI stage) and anatomic complexity (GLASS stage).
- Limited data exist on limb outcomes following infrapopliteal vein bypass stratified by WIfI and GLASS stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate limb outcomes after infrapopliteal vein bypass in relation to WIfI and GLASS staging.
- To assess limb salvage, amputation rates, wound healing, and healing time based on these classifications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 353 infrapopliteal vein bypasses in 284 patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
- Comparison of medium-term limb outcomes, including limb salvage rate, major to minor amputation ratio, wound healing rate, and wound healing time, across WIfI and GLASS stages.
Main Results:
- The 3-year limb salvage rate was 87%, significantly lower in WIfI stage 4 compared to stage 2.
- Wound healing rate at 12 months was 86%, also significantly lower in WIfI stage 4 versus stages 2 and 3.
- Wound healing time was significantly longer in WIfI stage 4 compared to stages 2 and 3; no significant differences were observed across GLASS stages for any outcome.
Conclusions:
- Limb outcomes after infrapopliteal vein bypass are significantly associated with limb severity (WIfI stage).
- Anatomic complexity (GLASS stage) did not show a significant association with limb outcomes in this cohort.
- Preoperative strategy and perioperative management should be tailored to patients with greater limb severity (higher WIfI stage).
Objective:
The 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines recommend a suitable initial revascularization method with reference to limb severity (wound, ischemia, and foot infection [WIfI] stage) and anatomic complexity (Global Limb Anatomical Staging System [GLASS] stage). However, limb outcomes after revascularization among WIfI and GLASS stages have not been investigated fully after infrapopliteal vein bypass. The purpose of this study was to assess the four Global Vascular Guideline-recommended limb outcomes after infrapopliteal vein bypass in cases with different WIfI and GLASS stages.
Methods:
Patients who underwent infrapopliteal vein bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Medium-term limb outcomes were compared among WIfI and GLASS stages. The primary end points were limb salvage rate and major to minor amputation ratio, and the secondary end points were wound healing rate and wound healing time.
Results:
A total of 353 infrapopliteal vein bypasses were performed in 284 patients with tissue loss (male, 193 patients; median age, 77 years; diabetes, 71%; hemodialysis, 41%). A total of 111 limbs (31%) required only minor amputation and 38 limbs (11%) required major amputation. The major to minor amputation ratio was 0.34 with no significant differences among WIfI stages or GLASS stages. The 3-year limb salvage rate was 87%. This rate was significantly lower in WIfI stage 4 than in stage 2 (P = .049), but did not differ significantly among GLASS stages. The 12-month wound healing rate was 86%. This rate was also significantly lower in WIfI stage 4 than in stages 2 and 3 (both P < .001), but did not differ significantly among GLASS stages. The median wound healing time was 55 days (range, 32-110 days), and was significantly longer in WIfI stage 4 compared with stages 2 (P = .001) and 3 (P < .001), but showed no significant differences among GLASS stages.
Conclusions:
The limb salvage rate, wound healing rate, and wound healing time were associated with limb severity (WIfI stage), but not with anatomic complexity (GLASS stage). These findings suggest that an appropriate preoperative strategy and careful perioperative management are important for patients with greater limb severity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Veins of Lower Limbs
Formed by the union of the medial and lateral plantar veins, the posterior tibial vein, rising through the calf muscle, assimilates the fibular vein. The anterior tibial vein, a superior extension of the foot's dorsalis pedis vein, merges with the posterior tibial vein at the...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management

