Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

408
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
408

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Manual pointing bias reflects spatial organization of number knowledge.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Motion-numerical compatibility affects magnitude classification.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Rethinking the roles of language and task for spatial-numerical associations: Commentary on Hochman et al. (2025).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The left-digit bias in two-dimensional manual pointing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K

How does language affect spatial attention? Deconstructing the prime-target relationship.

Samuel Shaki1, Martin H Fischer2

  • 1Department of Behavioral Sciences and Psychology, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel. Samuel_shaki@hotmail.com.

Memory & Cognition
|January 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial language meaning influences attention. Explicit spatial words shift attention automatically, while implicit words require deeper processing to guide spatial attention shifts.

Keywords:
Attentional shiftConceptual cueingCue-probe paradigmProcessing depthSemantic primingSpatial priming

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Understanding how spatial language shapes cognition is crucial.
  • The role of explicit versus implicit spatial meaning in attention is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how words with explicit or implicit spatial meaning trigger spatial attention shifts.
  • To determine the processing depth required for spatial cueing by different types of spatial words.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments (N=156) used a visual target-discrimination task.
  • Participants processed prime words (explicit/implicit spatial meaning) and targets under varying processing depths.
  • Response rules manipulated the required depth of prime and target analysis.

Main Results:

  • Explicit spatial words induced spatial congruency effects regardless of processing depth.
  • Implicit spatial words only produced congruency effects when deeper processing of the congruency relationship was required.
  • These findings were consistent across different prime-target intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial connotations alone do not automatically trigger spatial attention shifts.
  • Explicit semantic analysis of spatial words is necessary for conceptual cueing of spatial attention.