Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Timing is everything: Early versus late palliative care consults in trauma
Audrey L Spencer1, Preston R Miller, Gregory B Russell
1From the Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, College of Medicine (A.L.S.), University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Departments of Surgery and Internal Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (P.R.M., G.B.R., I.C., B.M.), Winston-Salem, NC.
Background:
The incorporation of dedicated palliative care (PC) services in the care of the critically injured trauma patient is not yet universal. Preexisting data demonstrate both economic and clinical value of PC consults, yet patient selection and optimal timing of these consults are poorly defined, possibly leading to underutilization of PC services. Prior studies in geriatric patients have shown benefits of PC when PC clinicians are engaged earlier during hospitalization. We aim to compare hospitalization metrics of early versus late PC consultation in trauma patients.
Methods:
All patients 18 years or older admitted to the trauma service between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021, who received a PC consult were included. Patients were assigned to EARLY (PC consult ≤3 days after admission) and LATE (PC consult >3 days after admission) cohorts. Demographics, injury and underlying disease characteristics, outcomes, and financial data were compared. Length of stay (LOS) in the EARLY group is compared with LOS-3 in the LATE group.
Results:
A total of 154 patient records met the inclusion criteria (60 EARLY and 94 LATE). Injury Severity Score, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and medical comorbidities (congestive heart failure, dementia, previous stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy) were similar between the groups. The LATE group was younger (69.9 vs. 75.3, p = 0.04). Patients in the LATE group had significantly longer LOS (17.5 vs. 7.0 days, p < 0.01) and higher median hospital costs ($53,165 vs. $17,654, p < 0.01). Patients in the EARLY group had reduced ventilator days (2.4 vs. 7.0, p < 0.01) and reduced rates of tracheostomies and surgical feeding tubes (1.7% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion:
Trauma patients with early PC consultation had shorter LOS, reduced ventilator days, reduced rates of invasive procedures, and lower costs even after correcting for delay to consult in the late group. These findings suggest the need for mechanisms leading to earlier PC consult in critically injured patients.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Planning Nursing Care I
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

