Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
A response to Busey & Klutzke (2022): Regarding subjective assignment of likelihood ratios
1Forensic Data Science Laboratory, Aston University, Birmingham, UK; Forensic Evaluation Ltd, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract:
Busey & Klutzke (2022) states that "Morrison (2012) has argued that the likelihood ratio need not be quantitative but could be based on the expert's subjective evaluation." The statement appears to suggest that Morrison (2012) argued in favour of subjective assignment of likelihood-ratio values. This interpretation of Morrison (2012) is incorrect.
Related Concept Videos
Odds Ratio
Relative Risk
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
The Availability Heuristic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Probability Laws

