Drawbacks in the efficient monitoring of gold nanoparticle-based cisplatin delivery systems formation by HPLC-ICP-MS

Anna M Wróblewska1, Nina Gos1, Joanna Zajda1

  • 1Chair of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego St. 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.

Insights

This study compares two analytical methods, capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography, for analyzing gold nanoparticle-cisplatin (AuNP-CS) drug delivery systems. Both methods were evaluated for their effectiveness in characterizing AuNP-CS formation and efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Chemotherapy faces limitations due to side effects of anticancer drugs like cisplatin.
  • Nanoparticles, particularly gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), are explored for targeted drug delivery due to their biocompatibility and tunable properties.
  • Characterizing the synthesis and formation efficiency of gold nanoparticle-cisplatin systems (AuNP-CS) requires robust analytical techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the analytical performance of capillary electrophoresis with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS) and isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) for AuNP-CS analysis.
  • To investigate the challenges and optimization pathways for analytical methods applied to AuNP-CS.
  • To evaluate the resolution power and applicability of both CE-ICP-MS and RP-HPLC for scrutinizing AuNP-CS.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesis and preparation of gold nanoparticle-cisplatin (AuNP-CS) systems.
  • Analysis using capillary electrophoresis coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS).
  • Analysis using isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC).

Main Results:

  • Both CE-ICP-MS and RP-HPLC were employed to analyze AuNP-CS formation.
  • The study details the difficulties encountered during analytical method optimization.
  • A comparative discussion on the performance, applicability, and resolution power of both analytical techniques for AuNP-CS scrutiny is presented.

Conclusions:

  • This research provides insights into the analytical challenges associated with AuNP-CS characterization.
  • The study offers a comparative analysis of CE-ICP-MS and RP-HPLC for evaluating nanoparticle-drug complex formation.
  • The findings contribute to the understanding of analytical tools for quality control in nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems.