Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Study of In Vivo Glucose Metabolism in High-fat Diet-fed Mice Using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test OGTT and Insulin Tolerance Test ITT
Published on: January 7, 2018
Lipoprotein Insulin Resistance Index: A Simple, Accurate Method for Assessing Insulin Resistance in South Asians
Andin Fosam1, Rashika Bansal1, Amrita Ramanathan1
1Clinical Endocrine Section, Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Context:
Identification of insulin resistance (IR) in South Asians, who are at a higher risk for type 2 diabetes, is important. Lack of standardization of insulin assays limits the clinical use of insulin-based surrogate indices. The lipoprotein insulin resistance index (LP-IR), a metabolomic marker, reflects the lipoprotein abnormalities observed in IR. The reliability of the LP-IR index in South Asians is unknown.
Objective:
We evaluated the predictive accuracy of LP-IR compared with other IR surrogate indices in South Asians.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional study (n = 55), we used calibration model analysis to assess the ability of the LP-IR score and other simple surrogate indices (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance, Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, Adipose insulin resistance index, and Matsuda Index) to predict insulin sensitivity (SI) derived from the reference frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. LP-IR index was derived from lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Predictive accuracy was determined by root mean squared error (RMSE) of prediction and leave-one-out cross-validation type RMSE of prediction (CVPE). The optimal cut-off of the LP-IR index was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Youden index.
Results:
The simple surrogate indices showed moderate correlations with SI (r = 0.53-0.69, P < .0001). CVPE and RMSE were not different in any of the surrogate indices when compared with LP-IR. The AUROC was 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.89). The optimal cut-off for IR in South Asians was LP-IR >48 (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 70%).
Conclusion:
The LP-IR index is a simple, accurate, and clinically useful test to assess IR in South Asians.

