Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Heart Allocation Change and Multiple Temporary Circulatory Support as Bridge-to-Bridge
Iulia Barbur1, Eric W Etchill2, Katherine Giuliano2
1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Insights
The 2018 heart allocation policy change increased use of multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (mtMCS) devices, leading to faster transplants and improved survival for heart candidates. This policy change significantly benefited patients awaiting heart transplants.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Policy Analysis
Background:
- The 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) heart allocation policy aimed to optimize organ distribution.
- Multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (mtMCS) devices are used in advanced heart failure patients awaiting transplantation.
- Understanding the impact of policy changes on mtMCS device utilization and outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between the 2018 OPTN heart allocation policy change and the characteristics and outcomes of heart transplant candidates receiving mtMCS.
- To compare outcomes of mtMCS recipients before and after the policy change.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of adult heart transplant candidates listed between October 2014-January 2018 (prepolicy) and October 2018-January 2022 (postpolicy).
- Utilized data from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry.
- Compared mtMCS recipients at listing, transplant, 90-days, and 1-year post-transplant using multivariable linear regression and competing risks analysis.
Main Results:
- A higher proportion of transplant candidates received mtMCS postpolicy (4% vs 1%).
- Postpolicy, patients received their second device significantly sooner (adjusted 49 days) and reached transplantation faster (adjusted 35 days).
- Transplantation likelihood increased by 80% postpolicy, with reduced waitlist mortality and improved 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survival.
Conclusions:
- The 2018 OPTN policy change led to increased utilization of mtMCS devices.
- Postpolicy, mtMCS recipients experienced a shorter time to transplantation and improved post-transplant survival.
- Earlier progression to secondary device and transplantation under the new policy is associated with better outcomes.
Introduction:
We investigated how the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network heart allocation policy change was associated with changes in characteristics and outcomes of candidates receiving multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (mtMCS) devices.
Materials And Methods:
We included adult heart transplant candidates listed October 2014-January 2018 and October 2018-January 2022 in the United Network of Organ Sharing dataset. Prepolicy and postpolicy mtMCS recipients were compared at listing, transplant, 90-days, and 1-year post-transplant. Time between first and second devices and time between first device and transplant were modeled via multivariable linear regression. Transplantation likelihood was modeled using competing risks analysis.
Results:
Postpolicy, a higher proportion of transplant candidates received mtMCS (4% versus 1%, P < 0.001), and received their second device an adjusted 49 d sooner versus prepolicy (P = 0.001). Time to transplant was also an adjusted 35 d shorter postpolicy, with an 80% increased transplantation likelihood versus prepolicy (95% confidence interval: 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001). Postpolicy patients experienced reduced waitlist mortality (8% versus 14%, P = 0.04) with marked improvements in 90-day (93% versus 85%, P < 0.001) and 1-year (88% versus 70%, P = 0.01) post-transplant survival.
Conclusions:
Postpolicy mtMCS recipients are more likely to progress to transplantation sooner on the waitlist and their shorter waitlist course together with earlier change to a secondary device was associated with improved post-transplant survival versus prepolicy.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

