Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

980
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
980
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.5K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protein-Enforced Ligand Environments Reshape Classical Coordination Preferences in Copper Polypyridyl Complexes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Laminoplasty According to the Severity of Cervical Myelopathy.

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society·2026
Same author

GFP chromophore photophysics: ultrafast dynamics and hot ground state cooling in the neutral form.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Transient evolution and established states of color domains in fiber lasers with a doublet radiation spectrum.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Coherent Proton Transfer in the Excited State of Salophen Driven by a Specific Low-Frequency Skeletal Vibration.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Extended Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Charge-Transfer State.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.0K

Accurate Spin-Orbit Coupling by Relativistic Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip-TDDFT.

Konstantin Komarov1, Woojin Park2, Seunghoon Lee3

  • 1Center for Quantum Dynamics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang37673, South Korea.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|January 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary

A new method, spin-orbit coupling-mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SOC-MRSF-TDDFT), accurately calculates electronic properties. This computational protocol shows promise for complex molecular dynamics simulations involving intersystem crossings.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.0K
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.0K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.0K
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory

Background:

  • Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is crucial for understanding electronic transitions in molecules.
  • Accurate relativistic calculations are essential for heavy elements and processes like intersystem crossing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a relativistic mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SOC-MRSF-TDDFT) method.
  • To assess the accuracy of SOC-MRSF-TDDFT for spin-orbit energy splitting and intersystem crossing predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of SOC-MRSF-TDDFT within the mean-field approximation.
  • Comparison with experimental data and other high-level relativistic methods (4c-CASSCF, 4c-CASPT2, SO-GMC-QDPT2).
  • Application to atomic systems (C, Si, Ge, Sn) and molecular systems (4-thiothymine, thymine).

Main Results:

  • SOC-MRSF-TDDFT accurately reproduces experimental spin-orbit energy splittings for atoms C, Si, Ge, and Sn.
  • Calculations for 4-thiothymine show excellent agreement with SO-GMC-QDPT2.
  • The method successfully predicted intersystem crossing (S1 → T1) in thymine.

Conclusions:

  • SOC-MRSF-TDDFT is a highly accurate and practical computational protocol.
  • It is well-suited for challenging electronic structure problems, including nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD).
  • The method facilitates the study of internal conversions and intersystem crossings in large molecular systems.