Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

07:18
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
936
Understanding others' distal goals from proximal communicative actions
Martin Dockendorff1, Laura Schmitz2, Cordula Vesper3,4
1Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.
Plos One
|January 20, 2023
Summary
Observers can infer future goals from movement patterns. This study shows that kinematic cues in actions, like movement velocity, help predict distal goals beyond immediate actions.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Social Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Human social interactions often involve coordinating actions and communicating goals.
- Goals can be immediate (proximal) or future-oriented (distal).
- Understanding how we infer distal goals from observed actions is crucial for social cognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if observers can infer distal goals from kinematic modulations of instrumental actions.
- To explore the relationship between movement characteristics and the perception of future intentions.
- To determine if movement variations reflect goal interpretation rather than perceptual limitations.
Main Methods:
- Participants observed animations of objects moving at varying velocities towards an apparent endpoint.
- The actual distal goal involved moving the object past the endpoint to one of two occluded locations.
- Participants identified the perceived distal goal location based on movement kinematics.
Main Results:
- Participants accurately detected velocity differences and mapped movements to distal goal locations.
- The presence of a distal goal increased variability in mapping observed movements to targets.
- Experiments 2 and 3 ruled out perceptual discrimination difficulties as the cause of this variability.
Conclusions:
- Communicative action modulations are vital for inferring distal goals, not just proximal ones.
- Movement kinematics provide rich information for understanding an actor's future intentions.
- Variability in action interpretation highlights the complex link between proximal actions and distal goals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Attribution Theory
13.1K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.1K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.4K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
50.2K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.2K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

