Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025
Standardized Hemorrhagic Shock Induction Guided by Cerebral Oximetry and Extended Hemodynamic Monitoring in Pigs
Published on: May 21, 2019
ARTERIAL DIAMETER VARIATIONS AS A NEW INDEX FOR STROKE VOLUME ASSESSMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON A CONTROLLED
Florian Ajavon, Fabien Coisy, Laura Grau-Mercier
1Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, Nîmes, France.
Abstract:
Background: The assessment of cardiac output (CO) is a major challenge during shock. The criterion standard for CO evaluation is transpulmonary thermodilution, which is an invasive technique. Speckle tracking is an automatized method of analyzing tissue motion using echography. This tool can be used to monitor pulsed arterial diameter variations with low interobserver variability. An experimental model of controlled hemorrhagic shock allows for multiple CO variations. The main aim of this study is to show the correlation between the femoral arterial diameter variations (fADVs) and the stroke volume (SV) measured by thermodilution during hemorrhagic shock management and the resuscitation of anesthetized piglets. The secondary objective is to explore the respective correlations between SV and subaortic time-velocity index, abdominal aorta ADV, carotid ADV, and subclavian ADV. Methods : Piglets were bled until mean arterial pressure reached 40 mm Hg. Controlled hemorrhage was maintained for 30 minutes before randomizing the piglets to three resuscitation groups-the fluid-filling group (reanimated with saline solution only), NEph group (norepinephrine + saline solution), and Eph group (epinephrin + saline solution). Speckle tracking, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic measures were performed at different stages of the protocol. Results : Thirteen piglets were recruited and included for statistical analysis. Of all the piglets, 164 fADV measures were attempted and 160 were successful (98%). The correlation coefficient between fADV and SV was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.78; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between SV and abdominal aorta ADV, subclavian ADV, and carotid ADV was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46; P < 0.01), 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.66, P < 0.01), and 0.15 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.30, P = 0.06), respectively. Conclusions : In this hemorrhagic shock model using piglets, fADV was strongly correlated with SV.
