Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

627
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
627
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.3K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.3K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

323
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
323
Star Classification01:18

Star Classification

4
Star ClassificationStars are massive, glowing spheres of gas that generate energy through nuclear fusion. They vary in size, color, and temperature. Scientists classify stars based on their temperature, brightness, and composition. One key tool used for this classification is the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram, which organizes stars into categories. The main types of stars include main sequence stars, giant stars, supergiants, and white dwarfs. Learning about the classification of stars...
4

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory brainstem-cortical anatomy constrains the magnitude of frequency-following responses (FFRs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) coding speech-in-noise.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Elliptical speech reveals the use of broad phonetic categories aids noise-degraded speech perception.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Consistency in phonetic categorization predicts successful speech-in-noise perception.

JASA express letters·2025
Same author

Effects of Digital Noise Reduction Processing on Subjective and Objective (Pupillometry) Assays of Listening Effort.

Audiology research·2025
Same author

Lateral orbitofrontal cortex encodes presence of risk and subjective risk preference during decision-making.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Flexible imputation toolkit for electronic health records.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates State-Dependent Prioritization of Distressed Conspecifics.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hemispherotomy for Pediatric Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

When Robots Learn: Artificial Intelligence and the Next Human-Centered Era of Neurorehabilitation.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Changes in White Matter Microstructure and Cognitive Function in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond Ventricular Enlargement: Multimodal MRI Assessment Improves Surgical Decision-Making in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Personalized Observation, Execution, and Mental Imagery (POEM) Therapy in Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Telepractice-Based Single-Case Study.

Brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

637

Unraveling Spatial-Spectral Dynamics of Speech Categorization Speed Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Kazi Ashraf Moinuddin1, Felix Havugimana1, Rakib Al-Fahad1

  • 1Department of EECE, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

Brain Sciences
|January 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers modeled brain activity to understand why people respond at different speeds during sound categorization. They found that alpha-beta brainwave activity in specific regions correlates with response time variations.

Keywords:
behavioral responsecategorical perceptionconvolutional neural networkfrequency bandsguided GradCAM

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

503

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

637
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

503

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Categorical perception (CP) involves classifying sounds into phonetic categories.
  • Response times (RTs) reflect perceptual difficulty in categorization tasks.
  • RTs exhibit variability due to individual differences and task demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify brain regions and frequency bands influencing response time (RT) variations in categorical perception (CP).
  • To develop a model that decodes behavioral RTs from neural EEG data.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a parameter-optimized convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify RTs from EEG data.
  • Utilized Guided-GradCAM for visual interpretation to identify spatial-spectral correlates of RT.
  • Employed data augmentation, bandpower topomaps, Bayesian hyper-parameter optimization, and ANOVA analysis.

Main Results:

  • Observed correlations between alpha-beta (10-20 Hz) activity in left frontal, right prefrontal/frontal, and right cerebellar regions with RT variations.
  • Identified specific spatial-spectral patterns linked to different response speeds.

Conclusions:

  • Alpha-beta frequency band activity in specific brain regions is a significant factor in RT variability during CP.
  • Factors such as attention, template matching, acoustic prediction, motor control, and decision uncertainty likely contribute to RT variations.