Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

415
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
415
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

484
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
484
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

356
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
356

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design, Synthesis, and Multifaceted Antifungal Mechanism of Novel Indole Amide Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Production.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026
Same author

Assessing perinatal depression identifying abilities among maternal and child health workers in rural China using smartphone-based virtual patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

Midwifery·2026
Same author

Dual Photoredox/Cobalt Catalysis Enabled Regiospecific Markovnikov Hydroboration of Unactivated Mono-, Di-, and Trisubstituted Alkenes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Dual activation of cuproptosis and excessive autophagy by copper-bismuth metal-organic frameworks-loaded detachable microneedles in oral leukoplakia.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Establishment and multi-omics characterization of a PD-1-resistant murine esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026
Same author

Psychological interventions to alleviate death anxiety among patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

BMC psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

675

Intimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review.

Yanjia Li1, Keyi Zhou1, Siyuan Tang1,2

  • 1Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|January 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This systematic review evaluates intimate partner violence (IPV) screening tools, assessing their validity and reliability. It aims to guide researchers in selecting appropriate IPV screening instruments for diverse populations.

Keywords:
COSMINintimate partner violencescreening instruments

More Related Videos

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

12.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

675
Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

12.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant global public health issue impacting individual well-being and societal development.
  • Existing IPV screening instruments, such as Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (HITS) and Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS), have been adapted across various cultural contexts.
  • The proliferation of IPV screening tools presents challenges for researchers in selecting the most suitable instrument for specific populations and settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a systematic review of measurement properties of IPV screening instruments.
  • To evaluate the methodological quality of studies assessing the validity, reliability, and internal consistency of these instruments.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for the selection and use of IPV screening instruments in local contexts.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review protocol based on the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) methodology.
  • Evaluation of the methodological quality of existing studies on IPV screening instrument measurement properties.
  • Synthesis of data on validity, reliability, and internal consistency of selected IPV screening instruments.

Main Results:

  • The review will identify and critically appraise studies reporting on the measurement properties of IPV screening instruments.
  • Methodological limitations in current research on IPV screening tools will be highlighted.
  • Comparative analysis of the psychometric properties of different IPV screening instruments will be performed.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive understanding of the measurement properties of IPV screening instruments is crucial for accurate identification of victims.
  • This review will offer guidance to researchers and clinicians in selecting validated and reliable IPV screening tools.
  • The findings will support the effective implementation of IPV screening programs worldwide.