Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

60
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
60
Taping Over Different Ground Profiles01:12

Taping Over Different Ground Profiles

63
Taping over varying ground profiles requires careful adaptation to achieve accurate measurements. On smooth, level ground with minimal vegetation, the tape can rest directly on the ground. Here, the taping team, typically consisting of a head and a rear tapeman, coordinates their positions with clear communication. The rear tapeman holds the tape at the starting point and guides the head tapeman toward a range pole placed beyond the endpoint, using hand or voice signals to ensure alignment.On...
63
Differential Leveling01:12

Differential Leveling

240
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
240
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

109
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
109
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

189
During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance.
189
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment01:19

Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment

103
Constructing a roadway embankment over uneven terrain requires precise leveling to ensure stability and proper drainage. Surveyors use a leveling instrument and staff to calculate ground elevations and determine the required fill material at each point along the embankment alignment.The process begins by positioning a leveling instrument near a benchmark with a known elevation. A backsight reading establishes the instrument height, which serves as a reference for subsequent measurements. A...
103

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental Investigation on Passive Survivability of Lithium-Ion Batteries Under Extremely Low Temperatures.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Decks with Automated Acoustic Scanning System and Ground Penetrating Radar.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.9K

Real Depth-Correction in Ground Penetrating RADAR Data Analysis for Bridge Deck Evaluation.

Sepehr Pashoutani1, Jinying Zhu1

  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Accurate ground penetrating radar (GPR) analysis of concrete bridges requires depth correction. This study introduces new methods for GPR rebar depth correction, improving concrete bridge deck evaluation.

Keywords:
GPRbridge deckdepth-correctionmigration

More Related Videos

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.5K
Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
08:09

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Published on: September 12, 2017

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.9K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.5K
Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
08:09

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Published on: September 12, 2017

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Geophysics
  • Civil Engineering
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of concrete bridge decks using ground penetrating radar (GPR) is crucial for infrastructure assessment.
  • Current GPR amplitude correction methods often rely on two-way travel time (TWTT), assuming constant electromagnetic wave velocity, which can lead to inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a GPR depth-correction algorithm based on actual rebar depths for more accurate concrete bridge deck evaluation.
  • To compare the proposed depth-based methods against traditional TWTT-based corrections.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated GPR signals using gprMax software in concrete models with varying dielectric constants and conductivity.
  • Developed two novel depth-based correction algorithms utilizing migrated amplitudes and attenuation rates.
  • Applied and validated the proposed methods on field GPR data from two bridges using other NDE techniques and chloride concentration tests.

Main Results:

  • The traditional TWTT-based depth-correction method was found to over-correct GPR amplitudes, potentially underestimating concrete deterioration.
  • The proposed depth-based correction methods demonstrated improved accuracy in amplitude correction.
  • Validation confirmed the effectiveness of the new methods in assessing concrete bridge deck condition.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate GPR amplitude correction for concrete bridge decks necessitates accounting for actual rebar depth rather than solely TWTT.
  • The developed depth-based correction algorithms offer a more reliable approach for evaluating concrete bridge deck health and deterioration.
  • This research enhances the application of GPR in civil engineering for critical infrastructure monitoring.