Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.4K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.8K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.8K
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

8.4K
Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
8.4K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

1.7K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
1.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

12.9K
Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
12.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and type of contraception use among US college students: A needed update.

Reproductive health·2026
Same author

Refining <i>Trichomonas vaginalis</i> treatment in women and men: protocol for an open-label randomised comparison of multi-dose oral metronidazole versus single-dose oral secnidazole.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Expedited partner therapy provision for chlamydia at U.S. college health centers, 2023.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same author

Revisiting the Disulfiram-Like Reaction Between Alcohol and Oral Metronidazole.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2025
Same author

Evaluation of the novel HEalthy Lifestyle Project (HELP) youth mental health e-intervention for lifestyle behaviour change and mental healthcare system impact: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

PloS one·2025
Same author

What Influences College Students' Endorsement or Rejection of Affirmative Consent?

Violence against women·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

A framework for using real-time evaluative interview feedback for health promotion program and evaluation

Alyssa M Lederer1, Allison M Foster2, Norine Schmidt3

  • 1Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th Street, Suite 116, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

Evaluation and Program Planning
|January 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary

A new iterative feedback framework systematically improves health promotion programs. This approach, used in a chlamydia screening program, yielded vital insights and program enhancements.

Keywords:
ChlamydiaFormative evaluationFrameworkInterventionInterviewsSexually transmitted diseases/infections

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Program Evaluation
  • Health Promotion

Background:

  • Formative evaluation is essential for improving health promotion programs.
  • Existing frameworks lack systematic guidance for conducting formative evaluations.
  • The Check It program targets chlamydia screening and treatment for young African American men.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe an iterative real-time interview feedback framework for program improvement.
  • To detail the application of this framework within the Check It program.
  • To share lessons learned for broader adoption by program professionals.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and utilized an iterative real-time interview feedback framework.
  • Incorporated diverse stakeholder perspectives (participants, staff, researchers).
  • Conducted interviews with 15 participants in the Check It program.

Main Results:

  • The framework provided critical insights for program enhancement.
  • Several vital programmatic and evaluation improvements were implemented.
  • Identified strengths and challenges of the framework's application.

Conclusions:

  • The iterative feedback framework systematically enhances health promotion programs.
  • This model can be replicated or adapted for various program types.
  • Effective formative evaluation requires diverse stakeholder input.