Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Moral foundations and juror verdict justifications
Susan Yamamoto1, Evelyn M Maeder1, Lin Bailey1
1Carleton University.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to examine the ways in which mock jurors justified their verdict decisions using moral foundations language. Participants read a trial transcript describing a second-degree murder charge featuring an automatism plea (which negates the physical volition of a crime). They then provided a two-to-three sentence rationale for their verdict choice, which we coded for the contextually-valid presence of words from the Moral Foundations (MF) Dictionary. Mock jurors were most likely to use harm-related language in justifying murder votes. A qualitative description also revealed differences in the content of the justifications.
Related Concept Videos
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Ethics and Bioethics
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attribution Theory
Confirmation Biases
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...

