Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

13.1K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing the Reliability of Integrated Consensus Strategies to Boost Docking-Based Screening Campaigns Using Publicly Available Docking Programs.

Molecular informatics·2025
Same author

Assessing the Robustness and Scalability of Machine Learning Methods to Accelerate Ultralarge High-Throughput Docking Campaigns.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Lessons learnt from machine learning in early stages of drug discovery.

Expert opinion on drug discovery·2024
Same author

The Impact of Supervised Learning Methods in Ultralarge High-Throughput Docking.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2023
Same author

Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point.

ACS omega·2023
Same author

Solvent effects on the NMR shieldings of stacked DNA base pairs.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2022
Same journal

Advancing microalgae biomass cultivation for an integrated sustainable wastewater treatment and resource recovery.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Human adipose ECM alleviates radiation-induced skin fibrosis via endothelial cell-mediated M2 macrophage polarization" [iScience, Volume 26, Issue 9 (2023) 107660].

iScience·2026
Same journal

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation enhances exercise-induced hypoalgesia in patients with chronic low back pain.

iScience·2026
Same journal

From pre-tumor to tumor: Decoding the endoscopic-pathologic spectrum of neoplastic lesions in autoimmune gastritis.

iScience·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "A cobalt-aluminium layered double hydroxide with a nickel core-shell structure nanocomposite for supercapacitor applications" [iScience, 28 (2025) 111672].

iScience·2026
Same journal

Repurposing primaquine diphosphate for imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia via targeting BCR-ABL and Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

iScience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

449

How good are AlphaFold models for docking-based virtual screening?

Valeria Scardino1,2, Juan I Di Filippo2,3, Claudio N Cavasotto2,3,4

  • 1Meton AI, Inc, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA.

Iscience
|January 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

AlphaFold (AF) models, while accurate for protein architecture, perform worse in docking-based drug discovery compared to experimental structures. Refinement strategies may be needed for reliable high-throughput docking (HTD).

Keywords:
artificial intelligencecomputational chemistryproteinprotein folding

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

202
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

449
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

202
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • High-quality protein structures are essential for structure-based drug discovery.
  • Homology modeling is traditionally used when experimental structures are unavailable.
  • AlphaFold (AF) has emerged as a powerful AI tool for predicting protein structures with high accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of AlphaFold models for docking-based drug discovery.
  • To compare the performance of AlphaFold models against experimental protein data bank (PDB) structures in high-throughput docking (HTD).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a benchmark set of 22 protein targets.
  • Performed high-throughput docking (HTD) using AlphaFold models and corresponding experimental PDB structures.
  • Employed four different docking programs and two consensus techniques for performance evaluation.

Main Results:

  • AlphaFold models consistently demonstrated inferior performance in HTD compared to experimental PDB structures.
  • The accuracy of AlphaFold in predicting protein architecture does not directly translate to reliable docking performance.
  • Four docking programs and two consensus techniques all showed worse performance with AF models.

Conclusions:

  • AlphaFold's current capabilities may not be sufficient for reliable docking-based drug discovery without further optimization.
  • Post-modeling refinement strategies are crucial for enhancing the utility of AlphaFold models in HTD.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between predicted and experimentally validated structures for drug discovery applications.