Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Sucrose Preference and Novelty-Induced Hypophagia Tests in Rats using an Automated Food Intake Monitoring System
Published on: May 8, 2020
Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement
1Bioethics, School of Professional Studies, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract:
The practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Metabolic States of the Body: Fasting and Starvation

