Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support for High Blood Pressure Control: Patient Survey
David Dorr1, Chris D'Autremont1, Joshua E Richardson2
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Insights
Patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) tools can help manage high blood pressure (HBP). Detailed recommendations and trustworthy interfaces are key for patient engagement in HBP control.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Patient Engagement
- Cardiovascular Health
Background:
- High blood pressure (HBP) affects nearly half of US adults, increasing risk for heart attack, stroke, and kidney disease.
- Patient behavior is crucial for HBP management, with over 70 guidelines emphasizing lifestyle changes and home monitoring.
- Customized patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) tools are needed to improve adherence to evidence-based HBP care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand how to adapt CDS tools to effectively engage patients in controlling their high blood pressure.
- To identify patient preferences for CDS features that enhance trustworthiness and usability for HBP management.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods study combining survey-guided interviews with a limited cohort and a nationwide web-based survey.
- Participants (18-85 years) diagnosed with hypertension completed surveys on goal setting, treatment priorities, technology comfort, and CDS interface preferences.
- A/B preference questions assessed trustworthiness of different CDS user interface options and information display formats.
Main Results:
- 83% of participants prioritized BP control, 82% monitored BP at home, and 88% were comfortable with technology.
- More detailed recommendation displays were perceived as more trustworthy by 56%-77% of respondents.
- While detailed designs increased trustworthiness, they did not significantly influence the perceived actions patients would take.
Conclusions:
- Patients believe CDS tools can aid in high blood pressure control.
- Detailed design and messaging in CDS are perceived as more trustworthy by patients.
- Further research is needed to link perceived trustworthiness of CDS features to actual patient actions in HBP management.
Background:
High blood pressure (HBP) affects nearly half of adults in the United States and is a major factor in heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease, and other morbidities. To reduce risk, guidelines for HBP contain more than 70 recommendations, including many related to patient behaviors, such as home monitoring and lifestyle changes. Thus, the patient's role in controlling HBP is crucial. Patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help patients adhere to evidence-based care, but customization is required.
Objective:
Our objective was to understand how to adapt CDS to best engage patients in controlling HBP.
Methods:
We conducted a mixed methods study with two phases: (1) survey-guided interviews with a limited cohort and (2) a nationwide web-based survey. Participation in each phase was limited to adults aged between 18 and 85 years who had been diagnosed with hypertension. The survey included general questions that assessed goal setting, treatment priorities, medication load, comorbid conditions, satisfaction with blood pressure (BP) management, and attitudes toward CDS, and also a series of questions regarding A/B preferences using paired information displays to assess perceived trustworthiness of potential CDS user interface options.
Results:
We conducted 17 survey-guided interviews to gather patient needs from CDS, then analyzed results and created a second survey of 519 adults with clinically diagnosed HBP. A large majority of participants reported that BP control was a high priority (83%), had monitored BP at home (82%), and felt comfortable using technology (88%). Survey respondents found displays with more detailed recommendations more trustworthy (56%-77% of them preferred simpler displays), especially when incorporating social trust and priorities from providers and patients like them, but had no differences in action taken.
Conclusions:
Respondents to the survey felt that CDS capabilities could help them with HBP control. The more detailed design options for BP display and recommendations messaging were considered the most trustworthy yet did not differentiate perceived actions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

