Making machine learning matter to clinicians: model actionability in medical decision-making
Daniel E Ehrmann1,2, Shalmali Joshi3, Sebastian D Goodfellow4,5
1Department of Critical Care Medicine and Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. Dehrmann@umich.edu.
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) has the potential to transform patient care and outcomes. However, there are important differences between measuring the performance of ML models in silico and usefulness at the point of care. One lens to use to evaluate models during early development is actionability, which is currently undervalued. We propose a metric for actionability intended to be used before the evaluation of calibration and ultimately decision curve analysis and calculation of net benefit. Our metric should be viewed as part of an overarching effort to increase the number of pragmatic tools that identify a model's possible clinical impacts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...


