Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
930
Reliability of Using Texture Analysis of Periapical Radiographs Obtained Using Radiovisiography for Assessing Bone
Kunchala Sailasri1, Sri Guru Mangala Deepti Ganji2, Parth Satwalekar3
1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sri Venkata Sai (SVS) Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, IND.
Cureus
|January 25, 2023
Summary
Radiovisiography (RVG) periapical radiographs are unreliable for assessing bone quality before dental implant placement. Texture analysis from these images did not meet desired parameters for accurate pre-prosthetic planning.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Radiology
- Implantology
Background:
- Pre-prosthetic implant imaging is crucial for analyzing bone structure and proximity to critical anatomical sites.
- Radiographic analysis aids in quantitative and qualitative assessment for successful dental implant planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of texture analysis from periapical radiographs obtained via Radiovisiography (RVG) for dental implant planning.
- To determine if RVG imaging is sufficient for assessing bone quality prior to implant surgery.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 50 intraoral periapical radiographs taken with RVG before implant placement.
- Radiographs were assessed by four specialists (Prosthodontist, Periodontist, Oral Surgeon, Oral Radiologist) and compared to tactile perception during pilot drilling.
- The Lekholm and Zarb classification was used as a reference for qualitative bone assessment.
Main Results:
- Examiner accuracy varied, with the Prosthodontist and Oral Radiologist achieving 42% success, and the Periodontist only 26%.
- Accuracy was inconsistent across different anatomical regions, particularly in the anterior maxilla and posterior mandible.
- The study found that RVG radiographs did not consistently meet the required standards for bone quality assessment.
Conclusions:
- Intraoral periapical radiographs acquired through RVG are not sufficiently reliable for assessing bone quality in pre-prosthetic implant planning.
- Texture analysis of RVG images did not provide the desired accuracy for quantitative and qualitative bone evaluation.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative or supplementary imaging techniques for improved dental implant planning.

