Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

5.4K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
5.4K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI01:21

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

76
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, or CMRI, is a non-invasive diagnostic test that employs a magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create precise images of the heart and arteries. It provides comprehensive information about cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization without ionizing radiation.IndicationsCMRI diagnoses various heart conditions, including tissue damage from heart attacks, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis, aortic issues (tears, aneurysms,...
76
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan01:30

Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan

183
Description
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
183

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correcting fast irregular motion in PET: maximum-likelihood motion and activity (MLMA) reconstruction.

EJNMMI physics·2026
Same author

Motion mitigation in positron-emission tomography guided radiotherapy delivered on a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Mapping Neurodegenerative Changes in Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndrome Patients Using Fast MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-Domain (MR-STAT) Relaxometry at 3T.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Continuous Ventricular Volumetric Quantification in Patients with Arrhythmias using Real-Time 3D CMR-MOTUS.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Anticipating Moral and Economic Considerations, Opportunities, and Potential Frictions for AI in Medical Imaging: Multistakeholder Cocreation Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Standardization of MR Electrical Properties Tomography: A Guideline From the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Systematic comparison of MPRAGE and BRAVO T1-weighted MRI pulse sequences and brain morphometry in high-risk young adults.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Foot dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing microcirculatory changes after endovascular therapy in peripheral artery disease: A prospective pilot study.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Reconstruction of MRI from undersampled k-spaces of double-contrast volume acquisitions using deep neural networks.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Radiofrequency-induced heating safety of brain MRI scans at 7 T in the presence of a shoulder implant.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Incremental diagnostic value of microstructural time-dependent diffusion MRI in differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma over conventional MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Enhanced respiratory motion compensation in free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with GROG-facilitated bunch phase encoding and Golden angle radial sampling.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale
08:09

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale

Published on: April 19, 2021

5.3K

Cartesian vs radial MR-STAT: An efficiency and robustness study.

Oscar van der Heide1, Alessandro Sbrizzi1, Cornelis A T van den Berg1

  • 1Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics and Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3583 CX Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3583 CX Utrecht, Netherlands.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|January 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cartesian MR-STAT offers greater robustness against overfitting and artifacts compared to radial MR-STAT, making it more suitable for clinical quantitative MRI applications despite radial

Keywords:
Efficiency analysisMR-STATNon-linear optimizationQuantitative MRRadial MRI

More Related Videos

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
11:13

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: May 24, 2021

6.5K
Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
07:21

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking

Published on: February 12, 2011

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale
08:09

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale

Published on: April 19, 2021

5.3K
Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
11:13

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: May 24, 2021

6.5K
Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
07:21

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking

Published on: February 12, 2011

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Quantitative MRI
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • MR Spin Tomography in Time-domain (MR-STAT) is a quantitative MRI technique.
  • It estimates multiple quantitative parameters from a single scan using non-linear optimization.
  • This study extends the MR-STAT framework to non-Cartesian trajectories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Cartesian and radial MR-STAT in terms of time-efficiency and robustness.
  • To evaluate performance in simulations, phantom, and in vivo measurements.
  • To determine the optimal MR-STAT trajectory for clinical applications.

Main Methods:

  • MR-STAT framework extended to non-Cartesian (radial) gradient trajectories.
  • Comparison of Cartesian and radial MR-STAT using simulations.
  • Validation with gel phantom and in vivo MRI measurements.

Main Results:

  • Both Cartesian and radial MR-STAT demonstrated robustness against undersampling in simulations.
  • Radial MR-STAT showed higher dynamic encoding power but lower spatial encoding power.
  • Cartesian MR-STAT exhibited robustness against overfitting, unlike radial MR-STAT which showed artifacts in phantom and in vivo scans.
  • Cartesian MR-STAT had higher overall time-efficiency, though radial MR-STAT was faster for T1 in white matter.

Conclusions:

  • Cartesian MR-STAT is more robust against overfitting and artifacts, suggesting its preference for clinical settings.
  • Radial MR-STAT may require further optimization to mitigate hardware-related artifacts.
  • The choice between Cartesian and radial MR-STAT may depend on specific clinical needs and tissue types.