Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Trends in Gestational Diabetes Screening Practices in British Columbia from 2005-2019
Elizabeth Nethery1, Jennifer A Hutcheon2, Andrew Kotaska3
1School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening in British Columbia increased over time. One-step screening adoption rose after 2010 guidelines but varied by risk factors and region.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Health
- Endocrinology
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening practices have evolved with changing clinical guidelines.
- Understanding trends in GDM screening methods is crucial for optimizing maternal care.
- Previous research has not fully captured the shifts in one-step versus two-step GDM screening in British Columbia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in the frequency and method (one-step vs. two-step) of GDM screening in British Columbia.
- To examine GDM screening practices across pregnant individual subgroups and geographic regions.
- To contextualize screening trends within changes in local and national clinical practice guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing linked perinatal and laboratory billing data in British Columbia.
- Inclusion of all pregnancies delivered after 28 weeks gestation with screening dates between June 2004 and May 2019.
- Calculation of screening method prevalence and examination of practices in subgroups and regions relative to guideline changes in 2010 and 2013.
Main Results:
- Overall screening completion increased from 88% to 96% between 2004 and 2019.
- One-step screening use surged to 45.2% after the 2010 guideline change, then slightly decreased to 42.8% post-2013.
- One-step screening was more common in individuals with risk factors and in urban centers, with higher GDM diagnosis rates (18% vs. 9% for two-step).
Conclusions:
- GDM screening in British Columbia shows increased adoption of one-step methods, particularly among higher-risk individuals.
- Significant regional disparities and temporal variations in screening practices persist.
- Further research is needed to address inequities and optimize GDM screening strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Preventive Healthcare Services
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

