Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
15.6K
Marginal bone changes around platform-switched conical connection implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally: A
Claudio Stacchi1, Luca Lamazza2, Antonio Rapani1
1Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
|February 1, 2023
Summary
This study found no significant difference in marginal bone loss around dental implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally. However, deeper placement (2mm) prevented exposed implant surfaces after one year.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Periodontology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Early marginal bone modifications around dental implants are crucial for long-term success.
- Platform-switched implants with conical connections are designed to mitigate bone loss.
- Subcrestal placement is a common surgical technique, but optimal depth is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze early marginal bone modifications around platform-switched implants with conical connections.
- To compare bone levels when implants are placed 1 mm versus 2 mm subcrestally.
- To evaluate the effect of subcrestal placement depth on peri-implant bone levels after one year of loading.
Main Methods:
- A crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted with partially edentulous patients.
- Two platform-switched implants with conical connections were placed: one 2 mm (Test) and one 1 mm (Control) subcrestally.
- Radiographs were taken at implant placement, prosthesis delivery, and 1 year post-loading to measure peri-implant bone level (PBL) reduction.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mean PBL reduction was observed between Test (0.49 ± 0.32 mm) and Control (0.46 ± 0.35 mm) implants after 1 year (p=0.66).
- A history of periodontitis significantly correlated with increased PBL reduction.
- While no Test implants showed exposed surfaces, 11.8% of Control implants had PBL below the implant platform at 1 year.
Conclusions:
- One-year prosthetic loading revealed no significant differences in marginal bone changes between 1 mm and 2 mm subcrestal implant placements.
- 2 mm subcrestal placement resulted in deeper implant positioning without exposing the implant surface.
- Deeper subcrestal placement may offer a preventive effect against peri-implant pathology.

