Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Achieving proportionate governance review in Scotland: Threats and solutions
Diane Ma Swallow1, Carl E Counsell1
1Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Abstract:
The effectiveness of any healthcare-related research governance system is dependent on its ability to identify, challenge and change practices that compromise its ability to deliver timely, proportionate review. We present a case study outlining our experience of obtaining research ethics committee (REC) and Public Benefit and Privacy Panel (PBPP) for Health and Social Care approval to conduct a study which aimed to collect data on diagnostic and care pathways and determine the national prevalence of two rare diseases in Scotland. We discuss the threats posed to low-risk observational epidemiological research by disproportionate governance practices and propose practical solutions. In the context of increasing investment, the ever-increasing barriers to doing high-quality, low-risk epidemiological research using patient-identifiable information is concerning. Information governance committees, guided by clinical researchers, must step up as leaders in this area, making use of flexibilities and opportunities within the law.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Global Regulatory Systems
Threats to Biodiversity
Ethical Dilemmas II
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

