Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures: Equivalent Long-Term Reoperation Rates Between Fixation and Primary Arthroplasty
Brendan Y Shi1, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Dane J Brodke
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Objective:
Our primary objectives were to (1) determine the rate of requiring conversion to arthroplasty after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of geriatric distal femur fractures and (2) compare 10-year reoperation rates after ORIF versus primary arthroplasty for geriatric distal femur fractures.
Design:
Propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
All centers participating in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database.
Patients/Participants:
All patients 65 years of age or older who underwent operative management of a distal femur fracture between 2000 and 2017.
Intervention:
ORIF, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or distal femur replacement (DFR).
Main Outcome Measurements:
Reoperation.
Results:
A total of 16,784 patients with geriatric distal femur fracture were identified, of which 16,343 (97.4%) underwent ORIF. The cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty within 10 years of ORIF was found to be 3.5%, with young age and female sex identified as risk factors for conversion. There was no significant difference in 10-year reoperation-free survival rate between propensity-matched patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty (94.5% vs. 96.2%, P = 0.659). There were no differences in short-term complication or readmission rates between matched treatment cohorts, but arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of wound infection within 90 days (2.0% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.011).
Conclusions:
The 10-year cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty after ORIF was found to be low. There was no significant difference in long-term reoperation-free survival rates between patients undergoing ORIF versus primary arthroplasty. Primary arthroplasty was associated with significantly higher rates of acute wound or joint infection.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025