Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

12:00
Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
263.0K
Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode
Dennis Q Truong1, Alexander Guillen1, Mujda Nooristani2,3,4
1Research and Development, Soterix Medical, Woodbridge, NJ, United States of America.
Plos One
|February 3, 2023
Summary
Smaller electrodes in galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) improve postural control by increasing current focality and electric field (E-field) in the brain. This study simulated GVS to explain these clinical effects.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Vestibular System Research
Background:
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) uses electrodes on the mastoid process to stimulate the vestibular system.
- Electrode size is often unreported, yet a previous study found smaller electrodes (3 cm2) improved postural control, unlike larger ones (35 cm2).
- The current study aimed to simulate current flow patterns to explain these differing clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To simulate current flow patterns in GVS using different electrode sizes.
- To investigate the impact of electrode size on current distribution within the brain and vestibular labyrinth.
- To elucidate the relationship between electrode size, electric field induction, and observed clinical effects on postural control.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an ultra-high-resolution structural dataset for computational modeling.
- Developed a model to simulate current flow for various electrode sizes.
- Analyzed current distribution in the brain and vestibular labyrinth.
Main Results:
- Simulation results confirmed that smaller electrodes increase current focality.
- The use of smaller electrodes, with the specific montage, led to a higher induced electric field (E-field) in the brain.
- These findings support the hypothesis that increased focality and E-field contribute to improved clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Electrode size is a critical, yet often overlooked, parameter in GVS.
- Smaller electrode size significantly impacts current density and the induced E-field.
- The enhanced E-field generated by smaller electrodes likely explains the previously observed improvements in postural control.

