Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Variation01:19

Variation

7.2K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.2K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

114
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
114
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

11.9K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Information and Explanatory Goodness.

Erkenntnis·2025
Same author

Optimal COVID-19 lockdown strategies in an age-structured SEIR model of Northern Ireland.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2022
Same author

A hybrid computational approach for efficient Alzheimer's disease classification based on heterogeneous data.

Scientific reports·2018
Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

431

How good is an explanation?

David H Glass1

  • 1School of Computing, Ulster University, York St, Belfast, BT15 1ED UK.

Synthese
|February 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian framework for evaluating explanation quality. It proposes a complexity-based method to quantify explanatory goodness, balancing explanatory power and hypothesis complexity for better scientific understanding.

Keywords:
BayesianConfirmationExplanationExplanatory goodnessExplanatory powerInformation

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

431
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Bayesian Epistemology
  • Scientific Explanation

Background:

  • Evaluating the quality of scientific explanations is a fundamental challenge.
  • Existing measures of explanatory power, particularly probabilistic ones, require refinement.
  • The distinction between weak and strong measures of explanatory power, as introduced by Good (1968), is crucial for this evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To defend a specific Bayesian account of explanatory goodness.
  • To explore probabilistic measures of explanatory power.
  • To propose a precise method for quantifying explanatory goodness by balancing explanatory power and hypothesis complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of probabilistic measures of explanatory power.
  • Analysis of weak and strong measures of explanatory power.
  • Derivation and comparison of a specific strong measure, informed by a complexity criterion.

Main Results:

  • A new defense of a strong measure of explanatory power proposed by Good.
  • Demonstration that a balance between weak explanatory power and hypothesis complexity is necessary for overall explanatory goodness.
  • Identification of a specific strong measure that is favored by a complexity criterion, offering a more precise quantification of explanatory goodness.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian account offers a robust framework for assessing explanatory goodness.
  • A complexity criterion provides a principled way to select a specific strong measure from Good's family.
  • This approach allows for a more precise and nuanced quantification of explanatory goodness in scientific reasoning.