Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Identifying neurodevelopmental disabilities from nationalised preschool health check
Himang Mujoo1,2, Nicholas Bowden1,2, Hiran Thabrew1,3
1A Better Start National Science Challenge, Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Insights
Combining multiple screening tools significantly improves early identification of neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) in preschoolers. This composite approach enhances detection rates, offering better support for affected children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Developmental Psychology
- Public Health Surveillance
Background:
- Psychometric screening models for identifying neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) have shown limited success.
- Aotearoa/New Zealand utilizes the Before School Check (B4SC) for routine developmental surveillance in preschool children, incorporating psychometric and physical health screening.
- Existing methods for NDD identification often rely on individual screening measures, potentially limiting predictive accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if combining multiple screening measures within the B4SC can enhance the prediction of neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) in preschool children.
- To compare the predictive performance of a composite screening model against current referral pathways.
Main Methods:
- Linked administrative health data were used to identify NDDs (including ADHD, ASD, and intellectual disability) in a national cohort of children who underwent the B4SC.
- Cox proportional hazards models were employed to predict NDD onset using various combinations of screening predictors.
- Harrell's c-statistic was used to compare the predictive power of composite models against a model based on recommended psychometric referral cutoffs.
Main Results:
- The study analyzed data from 287,754 children, identifying NDDs in 10,953 (3.8%).
- The optimal composite model, integrating the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Parental Evaluation of Developmental Status, vision screening, and biological sex, demonstrated 'excellent' predictive power (C-statistic: 0.83).
- This composite model significantly outperformed existing referral pathways (C-statistic: 0.68) and improved NDD detection sensitivity by 13% without compromising specificity.
Conclusions:
- Combining B4SC screening measures through composite modeling substantially improves the identification of preschool children with NDDs compared to relying on individual psychometric tests.
- This enhanced identification can optimize access to crucial academic, personal, and family support services for children with NDDs.
- The findings support the integration of a multi-measure approach in early childhood developmental surveillance programs.
Objective:
Models of psychometric screening to identify individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) have had limited success. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, routine developmental surveillance of preschool children is undertaken using the Before School Check (B4SC), which includes psychometric and physical health screening instruments. This study aimed to determine whether combining multiple screening measures could improve the prediction of NDDs.
Methods:
Linked administrative health data were used to identify NDDs, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, within a multi-year national cohort of children who undertook the B4SC. Cox proportional hazards models, with different combinations of potential predictors, were used to predict onset of a NDD. Harrell's c-statistic for composite models were compared with a model representing recommended cutoff psychometric scores for referral in New Zealand.
Results:
Data were examined for 287,754 children, and NDDs were identified in 10,953 (3.8%). The best-performing composite model combining the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Parental Evaluation of Developmental Status, vision screening and biological sex had 'excellent' predictive power (C-statistic: 0.83) compared with existing referral pathways which had 'poor' predictive power (C-statistic: 0.68). In addition, the composite model was able to improve the sensitivity of NDD diagnosis detection by 13% without any reduction in specificity.
Conclusions:
Combination of B4SC screening measures using composite modelling could lead to significantly improved identification of preschool children with NDDs when compared with surveillance that rely on individual psychometric test results alone. This may optimise access to academic, personal and family support for children with NDDs.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Introduction to Developmental Psychology

