Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Long-term results of conservative treatment of pacemaker pocket site infections
Ufuk Eryılmaz1, Fatih Sivri2, Mehtap Şencan2
1Department of Cardiology, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Introduction:
The increasing frequency of cardiac device use has led to an increase in complication rates. The standard treatment for cardiac device-related infections is removal of the entire pacemaker system and reimplantation from the contralateral side after systemic antibiotherapy. The efficacy of various conservative treatments has been established for many years, but there is conflicting information in the literature regarding long-term efficacy.
Aim:
Our study investigated the long-term efficacy of conservative treatment in patients with pacemaker pocket site infection.
Material And Methods:
In this retrospective study, according to the exclusion criteria, 132 patients were included. Patients were divided into conservative and standard treatment groups. Conservative treatment was considered to be opening the pacemaker pocket capsule, removing all infected and necrotic tissue, cleaning the capsule, and embedding the battery in the prepectoral region in the subpectoral muscle region.
Results:
The follow-up time was 36 ±12.96 months in the conservative treatment group and 39.6 ±10.8 months in the standard treatment group. During this period, no re-infection at the pacemaker pocket site was observed in either group. Examination of the swab cultures of the patients' pacemaker wounds revealed negative culture results in 15 patients (15 out of 60) in the conservative treatment group. In the standard treatment group, 60 patients (60 out of 72) were culture-negative. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
After a rigorous evaluation, conservative treatment is considered effective and safe in the long term in patients with device pocket site infection.
Insights
Conservative treatment for pacemaker pocket infections is effective and safe long-term. This approach avoids complete device removal, offering a viable alternative for managing cardiac device infections.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac device infections are increasing with device use.
- Standard treatment involves complete system removal and contralateral reimplantation.
- Long-term efficacy of conservative treatments for these infections is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the long-term efficacy of conservative treatment for pacemaker pocket site infections.
- To compare conservative treatment with standard treatment in managing these infections.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study including 132 patients with pacemaker pocket site infections.
- Patients were divided into conservative and standard treatment groups.
- Conservative treatment involved pocket opening, debridement, cleaning, and local battery embedding.
Main Results:
- No re-infections were observed in either group during a follow-up of approximately 36-40 months.
- Culture-negative results were observed in 15/60 patients (conservative group) and 60/72 patients (standard group), a statistically significant difference (p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Conservative treatment is effective and safe for long-term management of cardiac device pocket site infections.
- This approach offers a potentially less invasive alternative to complete system explantation.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management

