Are We Correctly Measuring Mandibular Stability After Surgery-First Approach? A Comparative Study Based on Novel...

Using traditional measures to assess mandibular stability after the surgery-first approach (SFA) may produce inaccurate results because unlike the conventional orthodontic-first approach (OFA), the main dental movements occur after surgery in SFA, which produce unavoidable mandibular movements, especially in cases with postsurgical premature dental contact. As these movements are part of the surgical-orthodontic plan, they should not be considered an actual relapse. In this study, to avoid postsurgical dental movement effects, the authors used the relationship between proximal and distal mandibular segments to evaluate stability after SFA. Four easily located points on computerized tomography/cone-beam computerized tomography reconstructed 3-dimensional images were used to calculate 4 measurements between proximal and distal mandibular segments across the osteotomy line in two matched groups of patients (SFA and OFA) at 3 different time points (before, immediately after, and 1 year after the surgery). A high level of skeletal stability was found in the SFA group, with changes 1 year after surgery not exceeding 0.5 mm. The SFA was as skeletally stable as OFA, and the mandibular counterclockwise rotation after surgery was related to the planned dental movements and not the instability of the surgery itself. To avoid the illusion of this preplanned relapse, stability should be measured as a relation between proximal and distal mandibular segments, across the osteotomy and fixation line, and not as a relation between maxillary and mandibular landmarks or between the mandible and facial planes as classically described.