Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Loneliness Assuaged: Eye-Tracking an Audience Watching Barrage Videos
Published on: May 29, 2020
Effects of a video-based positive side-effect information framing: An online experiment
Friederike L Bender1, Winfried Rief1, Joscha Brück2
1Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg.
Objective:
Despite the public health value of vaccines, vaccination uptake rates are stagnating. Expected adverse events following immunization are a major source of concern and play a role in the emergence of vaccine hesitancy. Since nocebo mechanisms are involved in the perception of adverse reactions, positive side-effect communication is warranted. The aim of the present study was to compile a comprehensive communication strategy that minimizes expectations of nocebo effects while respecting the informed consent procedure.
Method:
In a randomized 2 × 2 between-subject design, 652 participants received information about COVID-19 or influenza vaccination using either standard side-effect messaging or messaging enriched with proven elements of expectation-optimizing framing. A physician presented information online via video. Moderation analyses were conducted to examine effects among particular subpopulations. Expected adverse event ratings following an imagined immunization, cost-benefit ratios of the vaccination, and future vaccination intentions were assessed.
Results:
Information content ratings were equally high in each group. Positive framing significantly decreased adverse event expectations in the COVID-19 information group and raised the cost-benefit ratio in the influenza condition, indicating higher benefits than cost expectations. Moderation analysis revealed that the framed side-effect communication lowered the expected COVID-19 vaccination uptake willingness in individuals with strong anti-vaccination attitudes.
Conclusions:
Facing the ongoing coronavirus mass vaccinations, positive information frames have a small but significant impact on vaccination concerns while upholding informed consent. Although intervention trials are still pending, this approach could help decrease vaccine hesitancy by reducing fearful expectations. However, it seems that it should not be used without considering vaccination attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
10:45Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
Published on: July 6, 2011
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
The Placebo Effect
Social Facilitation