Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025
A Novel Rescue Technique for Difficult Intubation and Difficult Ventilation
Published on: January 17, 2011
A new formula based on height for determining endotracheal intubation depth in pediatrics: A prospective study
Pei-Er Zhuang1, Jiang-Hong Lu2, Wei-Kai Wang1
1Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, NO. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China.
Study Objective:
The main objective was to devise an endotracheal intubation formula based on pediatric patients' strongly correlated growth parameters. The secondary objective was to compare the accuracy of the new formula to the age-based formula from Advanced Pediatric Life Support Course (APLS formula) and the middle finger length-based formula (MFL-based formula).
Design:
A prospective, observational study.
Setting:
Operation.
Patients:
111 subjects age 4-12 years old undergoing elective surgeries with general orotracheal anesthesia.
Interventions And Measurements:
Growth parameters, including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, middle finger length, nasal-tragus length, and sternum length, were measured before surgeries. Tracheal length and the optimal endotracheal intubation depth (D) were measured and calculated by Disposcope. Regression analysis were used to establish a new formula for predicting the intubation depth. A self-controlled paired design was used to compare the accuracy of the intubation depth between the new formula, APLS formula, and MFL-based formula.
Main Results:
Height (R = 0.897, P < 0.001) was strongly correlated to tracheal length and the endotracheal intubation depth in pediatric patients. New formulae basing on height were established, including new formula 1: D (cm) = 4 + 0.1 × Height (cm) and new formula 2: D (cm) = 3 + 0.1 × Height (cm). Via Bland-Altman analysis, the mean differences for new formula 1, new formula 2, APLS formula and MFL-based formula were - 0.354 cm (95% LOA, -1.289 to 1.998 cm), 1.354 cm (95% LOA, -0.289 to 2.998 cm), 1.154 cm (95% LOA, -1.002 to 3.311 cm), -0.619 cm (95% LOA, -2.960 to 1.723 cm), respectively. The rate of optimal intubation for new formula 1 (84.69%) was higher than for new formula 2 (55.86%), APLS formula (61.26%), and MFL-based formula. (69.37%).
Conclusions:
The prediction accuracy for intubation depth of the new formula 1 was higher than the other formulae. The new formula based on height: D (cm) = 4 + 0.1 × Height (cm) was preferable to APLS formula and MFL-based formula with a high incidence of appropriate endotracheal tube position.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
01:17Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
01:30Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
01:24Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
01:23Tracheostomy Suctioning II: Procedure
01:28Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...