Current evidence of multimodal anesthesia on postoperative outcomes: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Stefano M Arigoni1, Adina B Heitmann-Frei1, Marc S von Gernler2

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

Insights

Multimodal anesthesia (MMA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and opioid consumption but shows no clear effect on pain at 24 hours. Further research is needed for optimal MMA regimens.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Surgical Recovery
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Multimodal anesthesia (MMA) is utilized to decrease opioid requirements and enhance postoperative recovery.
  • Bundled MMA regimens, defined as opioids plus two or more adjunct analgesic modalities, lack systematic synthesis for patient-centered outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating bundled multimodal anesthesia regimens versus traditional opioid-based anesthesia.
  • To assess the impact of MMA on patient-centered outcomes including postoperative pain, nausea/vomiting, quality of recovery, and opioid consumption.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 RCTs (n=1828) comparing MMA (opioids + ≥2 adjuncts) with opioid-based general anesthesia.
  • Primary outcomes included postoperative pain, PONV, QoR-15, and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption (MME) and PACU length of stay.
  • Searches conducted across major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, etc.) up to October 2025; risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessed using RoB 2 and GRADE.

Main Results:

  • MMA demonstrated a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence (RR 0.59, low certainty).
  • A significant reduction in opioid consumption was observed with MMA (MD -7.0 mg MME at 24h, moderate certainty), with sustained effects.
  • No clear effect of MMA on pain intensity at 24 hours was found (MD -0.6, very low certainty). Data for QoR-15, PACU stay, and pulmonary complications were insufficient for pooling.

Conclusions:

  • Multimodal anesthesia (MMA) effectively reduces PONV incidence and opioid consumption but does not significantly impact postoperative pain at 24 hours.
  • The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low across outcomes.
  • Larger, standardized trials are recommended to optimize MMA protocols and patient selection for improved surgical recovery.

Related Concept Videos

General Anesthesia: Overview01:24

General Anesthesia: Overview

Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia01:29

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia

Epidural anesthetics are administered in the fat-filled epidural space, the outermost part of the spinal canal. This technique is commonly employed for pain management and anesthesia during lower abdomen and pelvis surgeries or labor and delivery.
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Stages of General Anesthesia01:22

Stages of General Anesthesia

Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia01:11

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal anesthetics are given during lower abdomen and limb surgeries to block sensory and motor neurons. They are administered in the mid to low lumbar regions, primarily acting on the cauda equina's nerve roots. The blockade level depends on the local anesthetic (LA) concentration. Usually, low LA concentrations are sufficient to block sensory fibers, while only high LA concentrations block motor fibers. Other factors like injection volume and speed, the patient's posture, and the drug...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview01:24

Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview

Intravenous anesthetics are drugs administered parenterally to induce anesthesia or sedation. Propofol is a widely used agent formulated as a 1% emulsion in soybean oil, glycerol, and egg phosphatide. It induces rapid anesthesia primarily due to its rapid distribution from the bloodstream to target tissues and is metabolized in the liver. However, it can cause significant pain on injection and hypertriglyceridemia. Fospropofol, a water-based prodrug of propofol, lacks these adverse effects.
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics01:13

Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics

The potency and duration of action of local anesthetics (LAs) are determined by their pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetics describes how LAs are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated from the body. When administered to the vascular tissues, LAs are quickly absorbed and enter the systemic circulation, reducing their localized effects. Adding vasoconstrictors such as epinephrine to LAs reduces their absorption into the systemic circulation, making them clinically effective. The...