Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
REACh for the preschoolers; a developmental assessment tool for 2-5 year old children in Sri Lanka
A V Caldera1, A R Wickremasinghe2, N Muttiah3
1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka. amandhicaldera@gmail.com.
Insights
This study developed the Ragama Early Assessment for Children (REACh), a new developmental screening tool for preschoolers in Sri Lanka. The REACh shows promise for early detection of developmental delays by preschool teachers, though specificity needs improvement.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Educational Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Low-resource settings pose risks to preschool children's development due to limited early detection methods.
- Preschool teachers are key non-specialists for early identification and intervention of developmental delays and disorders.
- Standardized and validated developmental assessments are crucial for timely support in early childhood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To design and test the psychometric properties of a novel developmental assessment tool for children aged 24-60 months in Sri Lanka.
- To create a culturally and linguistically adapted assessment suitable for preschool teachers to administer.
- To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary validity of the Ragama Early Assessment for Children (REACh).
Main Methods:
- Development of the Ragama Early Assessment for Children (REACh) tool and toolkit.
- Training preschool teachers on administering the REACh assessment.
- Preliminary psychometric evaluation including content validity, internal consistency, interrater reliability, and concurrent validity.
Main Results:
- Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) exceeded 0.70 across cognitive, language, social-emotional, and motor domains.
- Interrater reliability was over 65% for children aged 36-60 months.
- Concurrent validity showed sensitivity >0.75, with variable specificity across age groups (24-60 months).
Conclusions:
- The REACh is an acceptable preliminary screening assessment for preschool children in Sri Lanka, adaptable for teacher administration.
- While sensitive, the tool demonstrated lower specificity in the 36-47 month age group, indicating a need for refinement.
- Further enhancements and comprehensive teacher training are recommended to improve the assessment's overall validity and reliability.
Background:
Preschool children in low resource settings are at higher risk of missing developmental potential due to the lack of standardized and validated methods for the timely detection of children with developmental delays or neurodevelopmental disorders. The preschool teacher is a non-specialist resourceful link within the community to detect and offer interventions early. This paper discusses the preliminary iteration of designing and testing the psychometric properties of a developmental assessment for children aged 24 to 60 months in Sri Lanka. This assessment is designed to be conducted by preschool teachers in their preschool setting.
Methods:
Three processes followed: 1. Designing and development of the Ragama Early Assessment for Children (REACh) complete preschool developmental assessment and a tool kit 2. Testing and training teachers on conducting the REACh assessment 3. Preliminary assessment of the psychometric properties including content validity, internal consistency, interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Results:
A literature search identified 11 assessments and 542 items representing cognitive, social-emotional and adaptive, language and motor domains. Content validity was assessed to select and adapt items. A complete assessment tool was designed to be administered in four settings within the preschool. This was further improved during pre and pilot testing and teacher training. Cronbach's alpha measuring internal consistency was > 0.70 for cognitive, language, social-emotional and adaptive domains across all three age groups in 1809 children. Interrater reliability was > 65% for age groups 36-47 and 47- 60 months. Concurrent validity using a clinical gold standard demonstrated sensitivity of more than 0.75 for all age groups with variable specificities (24-35 months: 0.71, 36- 47 months: 0.43 and 48-60 months: 0.67) assessed in 75 children.
Conclusions:
This culturally and linguistically adapted tool was tested nationally in Sri Lanka. The inte-rrater reliability between teachers and research assistants was higher than 65% for all domains in children more than 36 months. The preliminary iteration confirms it as an acceptable screening assessment for all age groups but with significantly lower specificity in the 36-47 month age group. Further improvement in certain domains together with intense teacher training is likely to enhance the validity and reliability of the assessment.
Trial Registration:
Ethics clearance for the procedure was granted prospectively from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya (ERC no. P 131/06/2018).
More Related Videos
09:16Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017