Short-term difference only in reported outcomes (PROMs) after anterior or posterior approach to total hip
D-Yin Lin1,2, Anthony J Samson3, Matthew G Cehic3
1Department of Anesthesiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. d-yin.lin@sa.gov.au.
Background:
The direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may demonstrate better functional recovery compared to the posterior approach (PA).
Methods:
In this prospective multi-centre study, patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) and length of stay (LOS) were compared between DAA and PA THA patients. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D-5L, pain and satisfaction scores were collected at four perioperative stages.
Results:
337 DAA and 187 PA THAs were included. The OHS PROM was significantly better in the DAA group at 6 weeks post-operatively (OHS: 33 vs. 30, p = 0.02, EQ-5D-5L: 80 vs. 75, p = 0.03), but there were no differences at 6 months and at 1 year. EQ-5D-5L scores were similar between both groups at all time points. LOS as inpatient was significantly different, in favour of DAA [median 2 days (IQR 2-3) vs. PA 3 (IQR 2-4), p ≤ 0.0001].
Conclusions:
Patients undergoing DAA THA have shorter LOS and report better short-term Oxford Hip Score PROMs at 6 weeks, but DAA did not convey long-term benefits over PA THA.
