Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Subjective Assessment Underestimates Fraility in Patients With Heart Failure Referred for Advanced Therapies
Cassandra Heaney1, Alexis Knisel1, Ravi Vuthoori2
1From the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell is in Manhasset, New York, USA.
Subjective provider assessment (SPA) significantly underestimates frailty compared to the objective modified five-item Fried Frailty Index (mFFI). While providers correctly identify frail patients 84% of the time, they are less accurate when identifying non-frail patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Frailty assessment is crucial for evaluating patients for advanced therapies (ATs).
- Current clinical practice often relies on subjective provider assessment (SPA), or the "eye-ball" test.
- Objective measures, such as the modified five-item Fried Frailty Index (mFFI), offer a validated alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of SPA against the mFFI in patients referred for AT.
- To investigate the association between frailty status and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) levels.
- To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of SPA among clinicians.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-eight patients undergoing evaluation for AT were assessed using both SPA by three independent cardiac surgeons and the mFFI.
- Plasma MIF levels were measured and compared between frail and non-frail groups.
- Statistical analysis included kappa statistics for agreement and t-tests for MIF level comparison.
Main Results:
- SPA significantly underestimated frailty compared to mFFI (κ = 0.02-0.14).
- Providers correctly identified frail patients 84% of the time but only 40% of the time for non-frail patients.
- No significant difference in plasma MIF levels was observed between frail and non-frail subjects (p = 0.6).
Conclusions:
- Clinicians tend to underestimate frailty when using subjective assessments.
- While SPA is reliable in identifying frail patients, its accuracy decreases for non-frail individuals.
- The mFFI provides a more objective and potentially more accurate measure of frailty in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

