Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025
08:17
Practical Aspects of Sample Preparation and Setup of 1H R1ρ Relaxation Dispersion Experiments of RNA
Published on: July 9, 2021
4.8K
Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R1ρ dispersion.
1Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
|February 23, 2023
Summary
The adiabatic prepared approach in R1ρ imaging can reduce R1ρ dispersion in knee cartilage compared to block pulse methods. However, its effectiveness depends on tissue and radiofrequency pulse properties, requiring careful application.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Biomedical Engineering
- Quantitative Imaging
Background:
- R1ρ (spin-lock) imaging quantifies tissue properties but is susceptible to artifacts from field inhomogeneities.
- Two methods, composite block pulses and adiabatic prepared pulses, mitigate these artifacts.
- Adiabatic pulse methods show lower R1ρ dispersion in knee cartilage compared to block pulse methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors influencing R1ρ dispersion in adiabatic prepared vs. block pulse R1ρ imaging.
- To understand the underlying mechanisms affecting R1ρ dispersion differences.
Main Methods:
- Numerical simulations using two-pool exchanging Bloch-McConnell equations.
- Examined effects of free water pool size (Pa), chemical exchange rate (kb), adiabatic pulse duration (Tp), and bound pool chemical shift (ppm_b).
Main Results:
- Increased ppm_b, kb, Tp, and decreased Pa amplified the R1ρ dispersion difference between methods.
- Adiabatic pulse approach resulted in flatter R1ρ dispersion curves.
Conclusions:
- Adiabatic prepared R1ρ imaging can influence R1ρ dispersion.
- The impact is contingent on tissue characteristics and radiofrequency pulse parameters.
- Caution is advised when employing adiabatic prepared approaches for studying R1ρ dispersion.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
980
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
980
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
01:23Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes
697
In the absence of an external magnetic field, nuclear spin states are degenerate and randomly oriented. When a magnetic field is applied, the spins begin to precess and orient themselves along (lower energy) or against (higher energy) the direction of the field. At equilibrium, a slight excess population of spins exists in the lower energy state. Because the direction of the magnetic field is fixed as the z-axis, the precessing magnetic moments are randomly oriented around the z-axis.
697
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
01:14Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
1.1K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
1.1K