Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Ultra-high resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography improves coronary stenosis quantification over a wide
Emese Zsarnoczay1, Nicola Fink2, U Joseph Schoepf3
1Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Medical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, Korányi Sándor utca 2, Budapest 1083, Hungary.
Purpose:
To investigate the effect of using photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT with ultra-high resolution (UHR) on stenosis quantification accuracy and blooming artifacts from low to high heart rates in a dynamic motion phantom.
Method:
Two vessel phantoms (diameter: 4 mm) containing solid calcified lesions (25%, 50% stenoses), filled with different concentrations of iodine, inside an anthropomorphic thorax phantom attached to a coronary motion simulator were used. Scanning was performed on a PCD-CT system using an ECG-gated mode at UHR and standard resolution (SR) (0.2, 0.6 mm slice thickness, respectively). Images were reconstructed at 60, 80 and 100 beats per minute (bpm) (UHR: Bv56 kernel, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) level 3; SR: 55 keV, Bv40 kernel, QIR3). Percent diameter stenosis (PDS) and blooming artifacts were measured by two readers.
Results:
PDS measurements derived from UHR were more accurate than SR for both lesions at every heart rate (p ≤ 0.005 for all, e.g. 50% lesion SR vs. UHR: at 60 bpm 57.1% [55.2-59.2] vs. 50.0% [48.5-51.2], at 100 bpm 61.0% [58.6-64.3] vs. 52.4% [51.3-54.3]). Overall mean difference across heart rates and lesions compared to the nominal stenoses was 9.2% (Limit of Agreement (LoA), 2.4%/16.0%) for SR vs. 2.4% (LoA, -2.8%/7.5%) for UHR. Blooming artifacts decreased with UHR compared to SR for both lesions at every heart rate (p < 0.001 for all, e.g. 50% lesion SR vs. UHR: at 60 bpm 63.8% [60.6-69.5] vs. 52.5% [50.0-57.5], at 100 bpm 70.2% [64.8-78.1] vs. 56.1% [51.2-60.8]).
Conclusions:
This motion phantom study demonstrates improved stenosis quantification accuracy and reduced blooming artifacts with UHR-PCD-CT compared to SR, independent of heart rate.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

