Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Assessment of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations fabricated by three different methods using
Aim:
The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations.
Materials And Methods:
A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triple-scan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).
Results:
AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were significantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and milling method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305).
