Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025
In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
In Vitro Comparison of Several Thrombus Removal Tools
Katarzyna Pigoń1, Natalia Tomecka2, Dominika Korner3
1II Department of Cardiology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Background:
Although the routine use of thrombus aspiration is not recommended, the thrombectomy technique still might be considered for a selected population of patients. Therefore, the assessment of the effectiveness of commercially available thrombectomy devices is still clinically relevant.
Aim:
Here, we present an in vitro comparison of several different types of catheters that can be used for thrombus aspiration or removal.
Methods:
Through the removal of 6 h and 24 h human blood clots in an in vitro model, four catheters were compared: the Launcher, Pronto V4, Vasco+ and the stent-retriever Catchview. The aspiration efficacy was expressed as a percentage of the initial thrombus weight. The effectiveness of the patient's aspiration was dependent on the time of thrombus formation and was significantly higher for a thrombus formed over 24 h (58.5 ± 26.5%) than for one formed over 6 h (48.0 ± 22.5%; p < 0.001). In the presented in vitro model, Pronto V4 and Launcher showed the highest efficiency.
Conclusions:
Large-bore aspiration catheters were found to be more effective than narrow-bore catheters or stent-retrievers in an in vitro model of thrombus removal. The thrombus aspiration efficacy increases with longer thrombus formation times.
