Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Solid recommendations from soft numbers: the test/treatment decision.

R F Nease1, Y Bonduelle

  • 1Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, California 94305.

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|October 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Epithelioid trophoblastic tumour with pulmonary metastasis].

Revue medicale de Liege·2020
Same author

Surrogate markers predicting overall survival for lung cancer: ELCWP recommendations.

The European respiratory journal·2011
Same author

Valproate-doxorubicin: promising therapy for progressing mesothelioma. A phase II study.

The European respiratory journal·2010
Same author

Publishing web-based guidelines using interactive decision models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2001
Same author

Use of contrast for image enhancement during stress echocardiography is cost-effective and reduces additional diagnostic testing.

The American journal of cardiology·2001
Same author

Choice-matching preference reversals in health outcome assessments.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2001
Same journal

Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Microsimulation Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: Michigan Model for Diabetes-Chronic Kidney Disease Model.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Taste or Scale? Methodological Approach to Health Preferences Comparison across Groups.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Mind the Gap: Impact of New Labels on Public Perceptions and Calculated Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Melanoma In Situ Diagnosis-A Secondary Analysis of an Online Randomized Experiment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Metamodel-Based General-Purpose Autocalibration Tool for Simulation Models.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces the utility threshold approach for medical test and treatment decisions, simplifying patient utility assessments. This new method improves upon existing threshold models for better decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Medical Economics
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • The Pauker and Kassirer probability threshold approach is a standard for test/treatment decisions.
  • Medical decisions involve complex factors that may necessitate advanced analytical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and elaborate on the utility threshold approach for medical decision-making.
  • To demonstrate how the utility threshold approach simplifies decision analysis by reducing the need for precise patient utility quantification.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the probability threshold approach.
  • Development and explanation of the utility threshold approach for a single disease with three outcomes (cured, diseased, dead) and one diagnostic test.
  • Derivation of three key utility thresholds: treat/no treat (u), no treatment/test (u1), and test/treatment (u2).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The utility threshold approach maintains the advantages of general threshold methods.
  • It significantly reduces the requirement for exact patient utility values for outcome states.
  • Three specific utility thresholds (u, u1, u2) are defined and interpreted for decision-making scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The utility threshold approach offers an improved framework for medical test and treatment decisions.
  • This method enhances the practicality of decision analysis by focusing on threshold values rather than exact utilities.
  • It provides clear decision rules based on patient values and test results.