Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanical Characteristics of Steel01:18

Mechanical Characteristics of Steel

652
The mechanical characteristics of steel are assessed through various tests that evaluate its strength, toughness, and flexibility. These tests include tension, torsion, impact, bending, and hardness assessments, each providing crucial information about steel's suitability for specific applications.
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
652
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry01:16

Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry

257
Eccentric axial loading occurs when an axial load is applied away from the centroidal axis of a structural member. This scenario is common in engineering, where structural elements may not be directly aligned due to various design or functional requirements.
257
Normal Strain under Axial Loading01:20

Normal Strain under Axial Loading

600
Normal strain under axial loading is an important concept in the field of mechanics of materials. Axial loading implies the application of a force along the axis of a material, like a column or bar. This force can either compress or stretch the material. In the context of axial loading, normal strain is the deformation experienced by the material in the direction of the loading force. It's calculated as the change in length divided by the original length of the material. This unitless ratio...
600
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity01:15

Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity

309
Deformation occurs in axial and transverse directions when an axial load is applied to a slender bar. This deformation impacts the cubic element within the bar, transforming it into either a rectangular parallelepiped or a rhombus, contingent on its orientation. This transformation process induces shearing strain. Axial loading elicits both shearing and normal strains. Applying an axial load instigates equal normal and shearing stresses on elements oriented at a 45° angle to the load axis.
309
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials01:24

Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials

903
The stress-strain relationship in ductile materials such as structural steel or aluminium is intricate and progresses through several stages. When a specimen is loaded, it initially exhibits a linear length increase, depicted by a steep straight line on the stress-strain diagram. It indicates the material is elastically deforming and will return to its original shape once unloaded. However, when a critical stress value is reached, plastic deformation begins. This stage sees substantial...
903
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress01:25

Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress

205
In designing structural elements and machine parts using ductile materials, it is crucial to ensure that these components withstand applied stresses without yielding. Yielding is initially determined through a tensile test, which evaluates the material's response to uniaxial stress. However, tensile stress is insufficient when components face biaxial or plane stress conditions This condition requires advanced criteria to predict failure.
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
205

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Modelling for Efficient Inverse Analysis of Micro-Indentation Response to Determine Material Parameters.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Inverse Method to Determine Parameters for Time-Dependent and Cyclic Plastic Material Behavior from Instrumented Indentation Tests.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Micromechanical Modeling of AlSi10Mg Processed by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing: From as-Built to Heat-Treated Microstructures.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Wear Mechanism Classification Using Artificial Intelligence.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Effects of Microstructure Modification by Friction Surfacing on Wear Behavior of Al Alloys with Different Si Contents.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Influence of Temperature on Void Collapse in Single Crystal Nickel under Hydrostatic Compression.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Full-field Strain Measurements for Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Propagation Using Digital Image Correlation Method
07:37

Full-field Strain Measurements for Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Propagation Using Digital Image Correlation Method

Published on: January 16, 2019

9.7K

Mechanical Behavior of Austenitic Steel under Multi-Axial Cyclic Loading.

Abhishek Biswas1, Dzhem Kurtulan2, Timothy Ngeru2

  • 1Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation (ICAMS), Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Crystal plasticity accurately models low-nickel steel

Keywords:
austenitic steelcrystal plasticitymicromechanical modelingmulti-axial fatigue

More Related Videos

A Novel Biaxial Testing Apparatus for the Determination of Forming Limit under Hot Stamping Conditions
07:40

A Novel Biaxial Testing Apparatus for the Determination of Forming Limit under Hot Stamping Conditions

Published on: April 4, 2017

7.7K
Micromechanical Tension Testing of Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Specimens
05:38

Micromechanical Tension Testing of Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Specimens

Published on: April 7, 2021

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Full-field Strain Measurements for Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Propagation Using Digital Image Correlation Method
07:37

Full-field Strain Measurements for Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Propagation Using Digital Image Correlation Method

Published on: January 16, 2019

9.7K
A Novel Biaxial Testing Apparatus for the Determination of Forming Limit under Hot Stamping Conditions
07:40

A Novel Biaxial Testing Apparatus for the Determination of Forming Limit under Hot Stamping Conditions

Published on: April 4, 2017

7.7K
Micromechanical Tension Testing of Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Specimens
05:38

Micromechanical Tension Testing of Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Specimens

Published on: April 7, 2021

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Solid Mechanics

Background:

  • Low-nickel austenitic steel is crucial in various engineering applications.
  • Understanding material behavior under complex loading is essential for design.
  • High-pressure torsion fatigue (HPTF) involves combined axial compression and cyclic torsion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the suitability of isotropic J2 plasticity versus crystal plasticity for describing mechanical behavior under HPTF loading.
  • To investigate the axial creep deformation observed during HPTF experiments.
  • To compare the predictive capabilities of different plasticity models.

Main Methods:

  • Subjecting low-nickel austenitic steel to high-pressure torsion fatigue (HPTF) loading.
  • Implementing and comparing isotropic J2 plasticity models with associated flow rules.
  • Utilizing a micromechanical crystal plasticity model with Ohno-Wang kinematic hardening.

Main Results:

  • The J2 plasticity model failed to accurately predict the axial creep behavior.
  • The crystal plasticity model, incorporating microstructural aspects, demonstrated high accuracy in matching experimental HPTF data.
  • Significant discrepancies were observed between the J2 model predictions and experimental axial creep.

Conclusions:

  • Crystal plasticity, coupled with microstructural models, is highly effective for predicting material behavior under complex multiaxial cyclic loading.
  • Isotropic J2 plasticity is insufficient for capturing the observed axial creep in HPTF of austenitic steel.
  • The study highlights the versatility of crystal plasticity in materials under reversing multiaxial stress states.