Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Teeth01:15

Teeth

540
The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
540

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Autoregressive Models for Predicting Two-Dimensional Mandibular Landmark Displacement During Pubertal Growth.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same author

Effects of virtual reality relaxation on anxiety levels of adolescents and adults during orthodontic bonding: a randomized controlled trial.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same author

Multi-Institutional Assessment of Dental Students' Knowledge in Oral Soft Tissue Pathological Entities.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Efficiency of In-House Clear Aligners in Limited Orthodontic Treatment.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2025
Same author

A Novel Multimodal Deep Image Analysis Model for Predicting Extraction/Non-Extraction Decision.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2025
Same author

Perspectives of US pediatric dentistry faculty on the clinical management of molar hypomineralization.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2025
Same journal

Structural Associations Between Palatal Morphology and Upper Airway Dimensions: Genetic and Environmental Contributions From A Twin Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Impact of Simulated Obesity in Animals on RANK/RANKL/OPG Pathway During Orthodontic Tooth Movement.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Methodological Design for Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary and Mandibular Impacted Canines by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Scoping Review.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Dental Arch Shape During Development: A Longitudinal Twin Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Is Smartphone-Based 3D Photogrammetry Suitable for Indirect Facial Analysis in Patients With Dentofacial Deformities? A Trueness and Precision Analysis.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgical and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MISMARPE) - Immediate Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects With Tooth-Bone-Borne Versus Bone-Borne Expanders: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K

Can we predict orthodontic extraction patterns by using machine learning?

Landon Leavitt1, James Volovic1, Lily Steinhauer2

  • 1Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
|February 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately predicts some orthodontic extraction patterns, particularly for first premolars. However, predicting other patterns like second premolar extractions remains challenging, with molar relationship and crowding being key indicators.

Keywords:
clinical decision-makingmachine learningorthodontic extraction

More Related Videos

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K
3D Imaging of PDL Collagen Fibers during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mandibular Murine Model
09:33

3D Imaging of PDL Collagen Fibers during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mandibular Murine Model

Published on: April 15, 2021

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K
3D Imaging of PDL Collagen Fibers during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mandibular Murine Model
09:33

3D Imaging of PDL Collagen Fibers during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mandibular Murine Model

Published on: April 15, 2021

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Orthodontic extractions are common but predicting patterns can be complex.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers potential for improving prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of ML algorithms in predicting orthodontic extraction patterns.
  • To identify key predictors for various extraction scenarios in a diverse patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 366 orthodontic patient records.
  • Utilized 55 cephalometric and demographic features to train Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine models.
  • Models were trained and tested on data stratified by race/ethnicity and gender.

Main Results:

  • High accuracy was achieved in predicting upper and lower 1st premolar (U/L4s) and upper 1st premolar only (U4s) extractions.
  • Lower accuracy was observed for patterns involving second premolars (U4/L5s, U5/L4s, U/L5s).
  • Random Forest demonstrated the highest overall accuracy (54.55%).

Conclusions:

  • Supervised ML models effectively predict certain orthodontic extraction patterns (U/L4s, U4s).
  • Prediction accuracy is limited for extraction patterns involving second premolars.
  • Molar relationship, mandibular crowding, and overjet are significant predictors of extraction patterns.