Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility,
Wen Yang1, Tian Wu1, Yixian Wu1
1Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Insights
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a safe and feasible option for non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients needing pacemakers. This innovative approach showed no decline in cardiac function or left ventricular outflow tract gradient during follow-up.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) offers a physiological alternative to conventional pacing.
- Research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is limited.
- NOHCM patients often require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for bradycardia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of LBBP in NOHCM patients.
- To assess the efficacy of LBBP in improving cardiac function and hemodynamics in NOHCM.
- To compare LBBP outcomes in NOHCM patients versus a control group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective enrollment of 13 NOHCM patients undergoing LBBP.
- 1:3 matching with 39 non-HCM control patients.
- Collection of echocardiographic indices and pacing parameters.
Main Results:
- Successful LBBP achieved in 92.3% of NOHCM patients (12/13).
- Paced QRS duration and stimulus to left ventricular activation time were comparable between groups.
- Higher R-wave sensing and pacing thresholds in NOHCM group, with no procedure-related complications.
- Stable pacing parameters, preserved cardiac function, and no increase in left ventricular outflow tract gradient at 12-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- LBBP is a feasible and safe pacing strategy for NOHCM patients with bradycardia.
- LBBP does not negatively impact cardiac function or left ventricular outflow tract gradient in NOHCM patients.
- LBBP represents a promising physiological pacing option for selected NOHCM patients.
Purpose:
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.
Methods:
Thirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.
Results:
The successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6±20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4±15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4±17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9±14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2±10.5 vs 12.5±5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8±0.3 vs 0.6±0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8±8.3 vs 10.3±6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8±50.5 vs 101.4±41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15±2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.
Conclusion:
LBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.
Related Concept Videos
Decreased pulse rate
There are specific risk factors that can elevate the likelihood of developing bradycardia. Advanced age is a significant factor, with...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy


