Raw Electroencephalogram-Based Cognitive Workload Classification Using Directed and Nondirected Functional...

With the phenomenal rise in internet-of-things devices, the use of electroencephalogram (EEG) based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can empower individuals to control equipment with thoughts. These allow BCI to be used and pave the way for pro-active health management and the development of internet-of-medical-things architecture. However, EEG-based BCIs have low fidelity, high variance, and EEG signals are very noisy. These challenges compel researchers to design algorithms that can process big data in real-time while being robust to temporal variations and other variations in the data. Another issue in designing a passive BCI is the regular change in user's cognitive state (measured through cognitive workload). Though considerable amount of research has been conducted on this front, methods that could withstand high variability in EEG data and still reflect the neuronal dynamics of cognitive state variations are lacking and much needed in literature. In this research, we evaluate the efficacy of a combination of functional connectivity algorithms and state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for the classification of three different levels of cognitive workload. We acquire 64-channel EEG data from 23 participants executing the n-back task at three different levels; 1-back (low-workload condition), 2-back (medium-workload condition), and 3-back (high-workload condition). We compared two different functional connectivity algorithms, namely phase transfer entropy (PTE) and mutual information (MI). PTE is a directed functional connectivity algorithm, whereas MI is non-directed. Both methods are suitable for extracting functional connectivity matrices in real-time, which could eventually be used for rapid, robust, and efficient classification. For classification, we use the recently proposed BrainNetCNN deep learning model, designed specifically to classify functional connectivity matrices. Results reveal a classification accuracy of 92.81% with MI and BrainNetCNN and a staggering 99.50% with PTE and BrainNetCNN on test data. PTE can yield a higher classification accuracy due to its robustness to linear mixing of the data and its ability to detect functional connectivity across a range of analysis lags.